The sudden shift in the outlook for the Federal Reserve Chair candidate has caused a corresponding change in market sentiment.
Last Friday, Trump's statement that he is "inclined to retain Haskett" directly stirred the bond market. As Kevin Waugh emerged as a leading candidate for the new Fed Chair, government bond prices accelerated their decline, with the two-year U.S. Treasury yield soaring to 3.59%, reaching a new high since the rate cuts in December last year. Traders' expectations of two 25 basis point rate cuts within the year have shrunk significantly, and the rate cut outlook seems to be changing.
Why is the market reacting so strongly? The key lies in the completely different policy orientations represented by the two candidates. Waugh has a strong reputation in the central banking circle, but his hawkish traits run deep. During his tenure as a Federal Reserve Board member from 2006 to 2011, when the financial crisis was at its worst, he was still advocating for rate hikes and continuously warning about inflation risks. Although he later shifted to support rate cuts, his hawkish temperament has not faded. More troubling is Waugh's aggressive stance on balance sheet reduction, advocating for a significant shrinkage of the Fed's assets and liabilities, regardless of the pressure on risk assets.
In contrast, Haskett is interpreted by the market as more obedient to Trump and more flexible in policy.
Interestingly, strategists' predictions are even more thought-provoking. In the short term, Waugh may maintain a moderate stance, but if the economy overheats in 2027-2028, he is likely to revert to his hawkish nature, pushing up long-term bond yields. By then, the battle between tightening and rate cuts will become extremely complex.
With less than four months remaining in Powell's term, this contest for the Fed Chair is profoundly changing the future direction of interest rates. If Waugh takes office, it remains to be seen whether the hawkish stance will fully return or if a dovish-hawkish swing will occur in response to circumstances; the market is still observing.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaMillionairen't
· 17h ago
Vosh's rise to power feels like the dream of interest rate cuts is about to shatter; this hawkish stance can make the bond market flourish.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBro
· 17h ago
Wosh, this guy is inherently hawkish; the rate cut trend is probably going to cool off.
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 17h ago
Once again stirring up political games in the market, bonds plummeted directly, and the rate cut dream is shattered.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 17h ago
According to data, the probability of Wosh taking office directly drove the US Treasury yield to soar by 328 basis points... It is worth noting that this reflects a re-pricing of market expectations regarding policy.
The analysis is conducted from three dimensions: First, the persistence of hawkish genes is often underestimated; second, there is a 0.89 correlation coefficient between the aggressiveness of balance sheet reduction and pressure on risk assets; third, the economic cycle inflection points in 2027-2028 require proactive planning.
It is recommended to pay attention to the liquidation risks of on-chain lending protocols—under a high-yield environment, liquidation prices may face re-evaluation.
View OriginalReply0
Whale_Whisperer
· 17h ago
Wosh, this guy is still inherently hawkish. He's calling for interest rate hikes even during a financial crisis. Can't change his nature, huh?
View OriginalReply0
CoconutWaterBoy
· 17h ago
Wosh, this guy is really a hawk to the bone. No wonder the bond market crashed directly.
Speaking of which, Trump's move was quite clever; just one sentence sent the market on a roller coaster.
The balance sheet reduction fanatic is in power, so the dream of rate cuts might have to be awakened.
Let's wait and see; anyway, they might still pretend to be moderate until 2027, then we'll see.
This internal struggle can still get messy for a while. When it comes to interest rates, it really depends on who ends up winning at the end.
Bond shorts are laughing all the way to the bank, and I'm about to be wiped out in stocks.
The sudden shift in the outlook for the Federal Reserve Chair candidate has caused a corresponding change in market sentiment.
Last Friday, Trump's statement that he is "inclined to retain Haskett" directly stirred the bond market. As Kevin Waugh emerged as a leading candidate for the new Fed Chair, government bond prices accelerated their decline, with the two-year U.S. Treasury yield soaring to 3.59%, reaching a new high since the rate cuts in December last year. Traders' expectations of two 25 basis point rate cuts within the year have shrunk significantly, and the rate cut outlook seems to be changing.
Why is the market reacting so strongly? The key lies in the completely different policy orientations represented by the two candidates. Waugh has a strong reputation in the central banking circle, but his hawkish traits run deep. During his tenure as a Federal Reserve Board member from 2006 to 2011, when the financial crisis was at its worst, he was still advocating for rate hikes and continuously warning about inflation risks. Although he later shifted to support rate cuts, his hawkish temperament has not faded. More troubling is Waugh's aggressive stance on balance sheet reduction, advocating for a significant shrinkage of the Fed's assets and liabilities, regardless of the pressure on risk assets.
In contrast, Haskett is interpreted by the market as more obedient to Trump and more flexible in policy.
Interestingly, strategists' predictions are even more thought-provoking. In the short term, Waugh may maintain a moderate stance, but if the economy overheats in 2027-2028, he is likely to revert to his hawkish nature, pushing up long-term bond yields. By then, the battle between tightening and rate cuts will become extremely complex.
With less than four months remaining in Powell's term, this contest for the Fed Chair is profoundly changing the future direction of interest rates. If Waugh takes office, it remains to be seen whether the hawkish stance will fully return or if a dovish-hawkish swing will occur in response to circumstances; the market is still observing.