2026-01-17 03:50:58

#美国核心物价涨幅不及市场预估【利益分配成僵局？美国加密政策现变数】

Recently, the market has sent some interesting signals. According to insiders close to the Trump administration, if a major compliant platform cannot come up with a profit-sharing plan that satisfies traditional banking systems, the White House may reconsider its support for the structural crypto legislation.

It seems like a clash of bill provisions, but in reality? It all boils down to one question — how to divide the pie, and no consensus has been reached among the parties.

$BTC $ETH $SOL

Background: The United States is advancing the institutionalization of crypto assets, involving multiple stakeholders such as banks, exchanges, and regulators. Who will lead the market structure, how to distribute profits, and how to balance innovation and risk... these are all practical issues on the table. Changes in legislative support often signal that interests are still being negotiated.

BTC-0,47%

ETH-0,54%

SOL0,59%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DAOdreamer

· 4h ago

Basically, it's still traditional finance wanting a piece of the pie. Power struggle.

View OriginalReply0

DuckFluff

· 4h ago

Basically, it's a matter of arm wrestling—everyone wants a bigger slice of the pie. It also depends on how the bank officials behave; if they're not satisfied, they might cause another fuss. Policies are really unpredictable—sometimes favorable, sometimes uncertain—it's driving people crazy. The way this market is divided hasn't been finalized; the level of policy support will definitely fluctuate, which is perfectly normal. It's really difficult to find compliant platforms now; both sides need to be properly managed. Profit sharing is always the biggest issue; all the talk about innovation and risk is empty—money matters are what really count. It seems that in the short term, the legislation isn't very stable; just wait and see, it won't collapse immediately anyway.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-00be86fc

· 4h ago

Uh, this trick still follows the same old traditional finance playbook, just a different coat of paint.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaBrain

· 4h ago

Basically, it's just interest groups flexing their muscles. Everyone wants a bite of this lucrative crypto pie. The same old unwritten rules of the traditional financial system also apply here. No wonder the crypto world has never trusted Wall Street.

View OriginalReply0