Campaign funding patterns reveal financial ties shaping crypto policy positions. Industry observers note that regulatory stances often align with donor interests rather than reflecting balanced blockchain governance perspectives. Key figures in policy advocacy sometimes carry prior affiliations that may influence their current positions on digital asset oversight. These interconnections between banking interests, regulatory agencies, and policy advocates raise questions about the independence and objectivity of crypto regulation frameworks. Critics argue the current approach reflects institutional agendas rather than evidence-based policymaking for the Web3 ecosystem.