When it comes to privacy chains, many people's first reaction is "it's best to hide everything." But this is actually a misinterpretation of the real needs of institutional-level trading.
What truly troubles large funds is that once order books and large orders are exposed, a chain reaction follows—slippage, front-running, strategy leaks. This is not just paranoia—it directly impacts trading costs.
Recently, a project has offered a new approach with the Hedger product. Instead of purely "invisible" transactions, it’s more like a "financial-grade privacy module": external data is indeed encrypted, positions, amounts, and trade details are all masked, but when regulatory agencies or compliance audits need verification, proof materials can be provided at any time.
One of the most interesting mechanisms here is called the Obfuscated Order Book. Its goal is not complete anonymity but to prevent market participants from having to openly display their trading intentions—reducing the risk of targeted attacks and manipulation. For trading categories like securities and RWA that require regulatory compliance, this approach seems more aligned with reality.
The technical choices are also carefully considered. Using homomorphic encryption and zero-knowledge proofs in tandem, supported by a Hybrid UTXO/Account model to balance composability and integration with financial systems. This isn’t about stacking black technologies for the sake of concepts, but about thinking how it can be used in real markets.
A particularly critical detail: generating privacy proofs on the client side in the browser typically takes less than 2 seconds. Why is speed so important? Simple logic—if each privacy transaction takes half a minute, both institutions and retail investors will turn away. Balancing usability and privacy is itself a technical challenge.
The Alpha version has already been deployed in a public testing environment. This isn’t just a conceptual diagram from a white paper, but actual code that can be interacted with and run.
If this system works smoothly, the logical chain will be very clear: the more privacy transfers, contract interactions, and trade matching there are, the easier it becomes to quantify on-chain costs and security budget needs. The role of tokens will gradually shift from mere "narrative assets" to "business fuel."
If you want to participate and observe, there are two phases: first, review the Hedger Alpha testing process and scope—what types of transactions are supported, whether the wallet and toolchain are smooth—and then wait for the Obfuscated Order Book to move from theory into a testable stage. That moment will be a watershed for whether it can attract larger capital flows.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiTooHigh
· 15h ago
Slippage and front-running are indeed nightmares for large transactions. Generating a privacy proof in 2 seconds shows some real potential.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWell
· 15h ago
Amazing, finally someone has clarified the matter of privacy chains. It's not just for money laundering or hide-and-seek; the real need is to avoid being eaten by MEV.
Generating privacy proofs in 2 seconds is impressive. If they can truly balance UX and privacy, institutional funds will pour in.
Anyway, let's wait until Alpha is up and running. I'm already tired of the same old white paper spiel.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBro
· 16h ago
Complete privacy proof in 2 seconds — now that's true engineering thinking.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusBot
· 16h ago
This approach is indeed thoughtful, but it still depends on whether it can actually run smoothly.
Relying on narrative to approach fuel for tokens is a bit vague; we need to see significant capital inflows before making any conclusions.
A 2-second delay is acceptable, but can China's network conditions really be stable?
Hedger's obfuscated order book will only be considered a breakthrough if it truly solves the MEV issue.
Has alpha been tested? Can you provide a link?
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.eth
· 16h ago
Oh, this obfuscated order book is indeed quite different. Finally, someone is thinking about how to create something truly usable.
Balancing compliance and privacy used to feel like a pseudo-demand, but now someone is really hardening this logic.
That 2-second proof generation is pretty amazing; I really can't think of any other reason to reject this approach.
Waiting for Alpha to run on the testnet and see real results before making any judgments—right now, it's all just theoretical.
If RWA trading can be successfully integrated, this kind of privacy architecture will truly have heavyweight application potential.
Switching the token narrative from just a store of value to a fuel—that's exactly what I want to see.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420
· 16h ago
2 seconds to issue the certificate is indeed impressive, finally a project taking this matter seriously.
When it comes to privacy chains, many people's first reaction is "it's best to hide everything." But this is actually a misinterpretation of the real needs of institutional-level trading.
What truly troubles large funds is that once order books and large orders are exposed, a chain reaction follows—slippage, front-running, strategy leaks. This is not just paranoia—it directly impacts trading costs.
Recently, a project has offered a new approach with the Hedger product. Instead of purely "invisible" transactions, it’s more like a "financial-grade privacy module": external data is indeed encrypted, positions, amounts, and trade details are all masked, but when regulatory agencies or compliance audits need verification, proof materials can be provided at any time.
One of the most interesting mechanisms here is called the Obfuscated Order Book. Its goal is not complete anonymity but to prevent market participants from having to openly display their trading intentions—reducing the risk of targeted attacks and manipulation. For trading categories like securities and RWA that require regulatory compliance, this approach seems more aligned with reality.
The technical choices are also carefully considered. Using homomorphic encryption and zero-knowledge proofs in tandem, supported by a Hybrid UTXO/Account model to balance composability and integration with financial systems. This isn’t about stacking black technologies for the sake of concepts, but about thinking how it can be used in real markets.
A particularly critical detail: generating privacy proofs on the client side in the browser typically takes less than 2 seconds. Why is speed so important? Simple logic—if each privacy transaction takes half a minute, both institutions and retail investors will turn away. Balancing usability and privacy is itself a technical challenge.
The Alpha version has already been deployed in a public testing environment. This isn’t just a conceptual diagram from a white paper, but actual code that can be interacted with and run.
If this system works smoothly, the logical chain will be very clear: the more privacy transfers, contract interactions, and trade matching there are, the easier it becomes to quantify on-chain costs and security budget needs. The role of tokens will gradually shift from mere "narrative assets" to "business fuel."
If you want to participate and observe, there are two phases: first, review the Hedger Alpha testing process and scope—what types of transactions are supported, whether the wallet and toolchain are smooth—and then wait for the Obfuscated Order Book to move from theory into a testable stage. That moment will be a watershed for whether it can attract larger capital flows.