Recently, I reviewed my operations and it’s been quite lively—one project after another jumping in.
I invested around $2,500 in Aztec, spent $5,000 on Football but got stuck at the end, and threw in another $4,400 into Xmaquina. Then, I played more heavily with Infinex, spending $35,000 on 7 NFTs, but only got $240 worth of tokens during the public sale, which was a bit of a loss. I put $4,400 into the Space project, but how much I can actually get depends on future developments.
On Fluent, the community round involved 5 NFTs, with a limit of 1 ETH. Zama was even more aggressive—full participation in the community round, and I’m still considering whether to add more chips during the auction phase.
Looking back now, this round of operations had both gains and losses, but the biggest takeaway was a deeper understanding of these projects. Some projects truly have potential, while others might just be hype or paper projects.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
staking_gramps
· 11h ago
Haha, this big brother is really a project hunter. Infinex's 35,000 investment only yields a 240 quota, the gap is quite huge...
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalist
· 11h ago
Haha, Infinex's move was really incredible. Investing 35k only yields 240. That difference must hurt a lot.
View OriginalReply0
StealthMoon
· 11h ago
Haha, Infinex's 35,000 for 240, this buy and sell really hurts a bit.
But on the other hand, going around like this really stirs the water; some projects are indeed revealing their tricks, while others are just IQ taxes.
What's going on with the Football being stuck, it seems like many people have fallen into the trap.
Zama community keeps adding more rounds even after full deployment, this guy really dares to play.
Let's not talk about profits and losses; this experience is worth it, just consider it paying tuition.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSauceMaster
· 11h ago
Bro, with this move, Infinex's 35k for 240 is truly amazing. This is what we commonly call the "intelligence tax," right? Haha
View OriginalReply0
LayerHopper
· 11h ago
Spending so much and still daring to say "deep understanding," to me it looks more like you're conducting live testing for the project team.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterNoLoss
· 11h ago
Haha, this is a typical "wanting to buy everything" symptom.
That operation at Infinex where you exchanged 35,000 for 240... I feel for you, that's just outrageous.
How long has Football been stuck, still waiting?
View OriginalReply0
TideReceder
· 11h ago
Put in 35,000 and only get a 240 limit? Haha, that's just paying tuition fees. Infinex is really ruthless this time.
Recently, I reviewed my operations and it’s been quite lively—one project after another jumping in.
I invested around $2,500 in Aztec, spent $5,000 on Football but got stuck at the end, and threw in another $4,400 into Xmaquina. Then, I played more heavily with Infinex, spending $35,000 on 7 NFTs, but only got $240 worth of tokens during the public sale, which was a bit of a loss. I put $4,400 into the Space project, but how much I can actually get depends on future developments.
On Fluent, the community round involved 5 NFTs, with a limit of 1 ETH. Zama was even more aggressive—full participation in the community round, and I’m still considering whether to add more chips during the auction phase.
Looking back now, this round of operations had both gains and losses, but the biggest takeaway was a deeper understanding of these projects. Some projects truly have potential, while others might just be hype or paper projects.