A major leading exchange just completed a large-scale upgrade to its platform, thoroughly reforming its creator incentive system. The key change is—rewards are more substantial, but the requirements are also stricter.
Let's look at the numbers first for a straightforward understanding. The total reward pool jumped from about 100,000 to 500,000, nearly a fivefold increase. The chance to win is limited to the Top 500 in the Chinese-speaking region and the Top 500 globally, totaling 1,000 high-quality creators who can share the rewards, distributed in reverse order based on points ranking. It sounds quite attractive, but this is just the surface—the real changes are deeper.
The core shift in rules is towards "quality over quantity." Previously, the approach was to produce volume—posting five short articles daily to stay relevant. Now, this has been cut—only the points from one short article and one long article per day are counted. The official stance is clear: no longer for numbers' sake. Simultaneously, the weighting of points has been adjusted—content quality now has a significantly higher weight, while trading tasks' weight has decreased. This means you no longer need to desperately trade to boost your data.
The most critical change is in the evaluation criteria. Content quality is no longer judged solely by whether you wrote something, but by whether people actually view it. The platform has added interaction metrics—comments, shares, likes, and views—that will directly influence your final score.
For creators, strategies need to be adjusted. Since there is only one opportunity each day to earn points from a long article and a short article, you must ensure each piece is your most insightful and valuable content. Quality has never been just talk; now the platform quantifies it with data.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImaginaryWhale
· 22h ago
The reward pool increasing fivefold sounds great, but then it drops to only two articles a day... Are they forcing us to compete on quality?
View OriginalReply0
TokenUnlocker
· 22h ago
Wow, a 500,000 reward pool? Not a bad deal, but it feels like the same old "high salary, low guarantee" trick.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeWhisperer
· 22h ago
Haha, finally someone is taking it seriously. It's no longer the era where you can get by just by spamming 5 shallow articles a day.
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunner
· 22h ago
Wow, a pool of 500,000, this time it's not a false alarm
The reward is multiplied by 5, but the threshold is also skyrocketing. To put it simply, it's about filtering people
Only counting two articles a day? Then each article must be valuable content; nonsense and fluff are out of the question
Interaction data is the key. The days of boosting popularity with fake content are over
View OriginalReply0
DeFiCaffeinator
· 22h ago
This round of reforms is interesting; finally starting to crack down on fake creators. Thumbs up.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 22h ago
Honestly, this round of reforms is quite aggressive, directly choking off from quantity to quality... But it seems the direction is correct? The limit of two articles per day really forces you to write some real content, otherwise how can you stand out? It's just that this might further squeeze out small creators... The Top 1000 is still too scarce.
A major leading exchange just completed a large-scale upgrade to its platform, thoroughly reforming its creator incentive system. The key change is—rewards are more substantial, but the requirements are also stricter.
Let's look at the numbers first for a straightforward understanding. The total reward pool jumped from about 100,000 to 500,000, nearly a fivefold increase. The chance to win is limited to the Top 500 in the Chinese-speaking region and the Top 500 globally, totaling 1,000 high-quality creators who can share the rewards, distributed in reverse order based on points ranking. It sounds quite attractive, but this is just the surface—the real changes are deeper.
The core shift in rules is towards "quality over quantity." Previously, the approach was to produce volume—posting five short articles daily to stay relevant. Now, this has been cut—only the points from one short article and one long article per day are counted. The official stance is clear: no longer for numbers' sake. Simultaneously, the weighting of points has been adjusted—content quality now has a significantly higher weight, while trading tasks' weight has decreased. This means you no longer need to desperately trade to boost your data.
The most critical change is in the evaluation criteria. Content quality is no longer judged solely by whether you wrote something, but by whether people actually view it. The platform has added interaction metrics—comments, shares, likes, and views—that will directly influence your final score.
For creators, strategies need to be adjusted. Since there is only one opportunity each day to earn points from a long article and a short article, you must ensure each piece is your most insightful and valuable content. Quality has never been just talk; now the platform quantifies it with data.