According to the latest November data released by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the total foreign holdings of U.S. debt reached $9.36 trillion, hitting a record high. But behind this number, there is an interesting story.
First, let's look at the rankings by country. China decreased its holdings by $6.1 billion in November, down to $682.6 billion, being surpassed by the UK by $200 billion and falling to third place. Within this total of $9.36 trillion, the changes in holdings by these national institutions actually reflect a deeper shift in attitude.
A numerical comparison can illustrate the issue well. Foreign holdings increased from $6.17 trillion in 2015 to $9.36 trillion in 2025, a growth of about 51%. Meanwhile, the total amount of U.S. debt surged from $18.15 trillion to over $38 trillion, more than doubling. In other words, although foreign holdings are increasing, their proportion is actually decreasing. It’s like the cake has grown larger, but your slice has become relatively smaller.
More noteworthy is the structural change. The proportion of foreign debt held by official institutions such as central banks has fallen from 80% to less than 50%, a decline of over half. This retreat of large official funds indicates a significant shift—they are not avoiding U.S. debt altogether, but reallocating assets. Many official institutions are turning to alternative assets like gold, and now official holdings account for only 16% of foreign U.S. debt holdings.
Why are non-official institutions still increasing their holdings? The logic is actually simple. Some international financial institutions, corporations, and investment funds are more sensitive to yields, and short-term U.S. debt interest remains attractive. They hold a lot of idle dollars and investing in U.S. debt can provide stable returns. The UK’s financial institutions are a typical example—dense with professional wealth management firms, and such short-term considerations have boosted the UK’s ranking in U.S. debt holdings.
But the logic for large official funds is completely different. Once investments reach hundreds of billions or even trillions, asset allocation decisions must consider long-term risks and liquidity. Official institutions not only look at returns but also evaluate asset safety and geopolitical risks. The significant decline in debt holdings proportion indicates that these decision-makers are cautiously adjusting their strategies rather than following the trend.
In short, although the total size of U.S. debt is at a new high and foreign investment is increasing, this is more of a market-driven behavior—since the dollar remains the main international reserve currency and U.S. debt is still the largest fixed-income market. However, the underlying capital structure is quietly shifting, and official institutions are becoming more cautious.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SatsStacking
· 12h ago
Official large funds are moving, this signal is too obvious; gold is the real hard asset.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 12h ago
According to data, the proportion of official central bank institutions has shifted from 80% to 16%. This change reflects not only asset allocation but also a reassessment of long-term geopolitical risks. Notably, although the total US debt has doubled, the proportion held by foreign investors has shrunk—indicating a passive acceptance rather than active allocation.
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtist
· 12h ago
Official institutions are moving, isn't this just a head and shoulders top pattern... I didn't recognize it at first, but now looking at the drop from 81% to 50%, that's a warning sign. They are reducing their positions, while retail investors are still buying in, it's really unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 12h ago
Official institutions are rushing to withdraw; this is the real signal, not just about the numbers looking good.
According to the latest November data released by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the total foreign holdings of U.S. debt reached $9.36 trillion, hitting a record high. But behind this number, there is an interesting story.
First, let's look at the rankings by country. China decreased its holdings by $6.1 billion in November, down to $682.6 billion, being surpassed by the UK by $200 billion and falling to third place. Within this total of $9.36 trillion, the changes in holdings by these national institutions actually reflect a deeper shift in attitude.
A numerical comparison can illustrate the issue well. Foreign holdings increased from $6.17 trillion in 2015 to $9.36 trillion in 2025, a growth of about 51%. Meanwhile, the total amount of U.S. debt surged from $18.15 trillion to over $38 trillion, more than doubling. In other words, although foreign holdings are increasing, their proportion is actually decreasing. It’s like the cake has grown larger, but your slice has become relatively smaller.
More noteworthy is the structural change. The proportion of foreign debt held by official institutions such as central banks has fallen from 80% to less than 50%, a decline of over half. This retreat of large official funds indicates a significant shift—they are not avoiding U.S. debt altogether, but reallocating assets. Many official institutions are turning to alternative assets like gold, and now official holdings account for only 16% of foreign U.S. debt holdings.
Why are non-official institutions still increasing their holdings? The logic is actually simple. Some international financial institutions, corporations, and investment funds are more sensitive to yields, and short-term U.S. debt interest remains attractive. They hold a lot of idle dollars and investing in U.S. debt can provide stable returns. The UK’s financial institutions are a typical example—dense with professional wealth management firms, and such short-term considerations have boosted the UK’s ranking in U.S. debt holdings.
But the logic for large official funds is completely different. Once investments reach hundreds of billions or even trillions, asset allocation decisions must consider long-term risks and liquidity. Official institutions not only look at returns but also evaluate asset safety and geopolitical risks. The significant decline in debt holdings proportion indicates that these decision-makers are cautiously adjusting their strategies rather than following the trend.
In short, although the total size of U.S. debt is at a new high and foreign investment is increasing, this is more of a market-driven behavior—since the dollar remains the main international reserve currency and U.S. debt is still the largest fixed-income market. However, the underlying capital structure is quietly shifting, and official institutions are becoming more cautious.