A recent interesting phenomenon worth pondering: political pressure on the Federal Reserve Chair is increasing, yet the market's response is actually more firmly supporting the central bank's independence. The dollar is weakening, and gold is surging, which behind the scenes is actually a vote by global capital for the Fed's independent status.
The direction of this game has completely reversed expectations. Originally, the plan was to influence the Fed's decision through pressure, but instead, it has elevated the authority of this official. Several government candidates are either on the defensive or remain silent, while their support rates are quietly rising—political calculations clearly backfired.
Why does the market place such importance on central bank independence? Because it is the cornerstone of the financial system. Once the central bank is politically interfered with, the entire financial order will shake. So you see, the more obvious the signals of political intervention, the stronger the Fed's rebound—this is like the immune system's response to an invasion; the more intense, the greater the threat.
From this logical deduction, those expecting the Fed to quickly flood the market with liquidity and cut rates significantly may need to reconsider. Political pressure might instead make the Fed more cautious and hawkish.
In this context, what is the smart choice? Hold safe-haven assets, stay patient, and wait for real certainty to emerge. The key questions become: Will Powell be provoked into becoming more hawkish by this game? Will the Fed's rate cut window continue to be delayed? These are all worth close attention.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashRatePhilosopher
· 5h ago
Powell is really tough; the greater the political pressure, the more hawkish he becomes.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHustler
· 5h ago
Powell is really tough; the more pressure, the stronger he gets.
View OriginalReply0
FlippedSignal
· 5h ago
Haha, political pressure has instead strengthened independence, which is quite ironic.
---
Powell has become even more hardened by this, those betting against the Fed cutting rates are probably going to get caught.
---
Central bank independence is the moat of finance; breaking it would be disastrous.
---
Gold prices surge, the dollar weakens, and the market is voting with money to support the Federal Reserve—this says more than anything else.
---
Wait, if we reverse this logic, the more politicians pressure, the more they self-destruct? Why are they still causing trouble then?
---
Holding safe-haven assets is about certainty, but I think Powell has already been provoked; a rate cut is far off.
---
The government trying to influence the Fed has actually given it more power—probably the most ironic thing this year.
---
The analogy of the immune system is good, but the question is, how long can the overall economy sustain this "caution"?
---
It seems the dream of rapid liquidity injection should be awakened; the Fed is clearly aiming for a hard landing.
---
Interesting, the greater the pressure, the stronger the independence; politicians are truly masters of reverse psychology.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinHunter
· 5h ago
Political intervention actually strengthens the independence of the central bank, which is indeed a clever logic. To put it simply, the market is investing in the credibility of the central bank and not buying politicians' accounts. The gold surge is actually a signal, with large funds avoiding risks.
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 5h ago
Powell really got angry, the more pressure he applies, the more hawkish he becomes. This game is played backwards haha
Gold quietly making big profits, the independence of the central bank is worth more than anything
Politicians really underestimated the market, capital is not stupid
Cut interest rates? Haha, maybe not this year
Holding cash and waiting is the right move, don’t bet against the Federal Reserve
The market is voting, and we’re all betting on the central bank’s stance. Interesting
This logic is spot on, the more pressure, the more hawkish the Fed becomes, immune response haha
Wait everyone, don’t act until certainty appears
Dollar weak, gold strong—why does this scene look so familiar?
Political pressure has instead become the Fed’s shield, so ironic
Safe-haven assets should be allocated, these past few months are nerve-wracking
Powell: Want me to cut rates? You guys better try harder
The financial order is tightly wound, any touch causes a rebound
Those bears need to rethink their strategies
A recent interesting phenomenon worth pondering: political pressure on the Federal Reserve Chair is increasing, yet the market's response is actually more firmly supporting the central bank's independence. The dollar is weakening, and gold is surging, which behind the scenes is actually a vote by global capital for the Fed's independent status.
The direction of this game has completely reversed expectations. Originally, the plan was to influence the Fed's decision through pressure, but instead, it has elevated the authority of this official. Several government candidates are either on the defensive or remain silent, while their support rates are quietly rising—political calculations clearly backfired.
Why does the market place such importance on central bank independence? Because it is the cornerstone of the financial system. Once the central bank is politically interfered with, the entire financial order will shake. So you see, the more obvious the signals of political intervention, the stronger the Fed's rebound—this is like the immune system's response to an invasion; the more intense, the greater the threat.
From this logical deduction, those expecting the Fed to quickly flood the market with liquidity and cut rates significantly may need to reconsider. Political pressure might instead make the Fed more cautious and hawkish.
In this context, what is the smart choice? Hold safe-haven assets, stay patient, and wait for real certainty to emerge. The key questions become: Will Powell be provoked into becoming more hawkish by this game? Will the Fed's rate cut window continue to be delayed? These are all worth close attention.