$MUBARAK's performance has recently attracted the attention of conservative investors. There is a monthly trading strategy that has yielded a 24.98% return over the past 30 days, and what's even more impressive is that the maximum drawdown is only 2.18%—this number indicates that risk control is quite effective. With a 100% win rate, the stability of the strategy is indeed worth noting.



For investors who want to profit without too much hassle, this type of steady strategy may better meet expectations. Long-term tracking of such an approach allows you to keep up with market trends without having to watch the market every day. Although the returns are not explosive, the combination of win rate and drawdown performance suggests that those engaged in long-term asset allocation should be able to see the pattern.
MUBARAK0,22%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FastLeavervip
· 5h ago
100% win rate? Feels a bit too perfect. Are there still strategies these days that don't fail?
View OriginalReply0
GrayscaleArbitrageurvip
· 5h ago
100% win rate? Honestly, that's a bit suspicious. Where in the market is there something so perfect... --- 25% profit + 2% drawdown sounds good, but I still want to see historical data. --- A blessing for conservative investors? Take it slow, I’m still used to tinkering haha. --- The monthly strategy is stable, just worried about a black swan coming later... --- I like not having to watch the market constantly, but only if it can really deliver these returns. --- I agree that risk control should be well done, but these numbers feel too clean. --- Long-term allocation definitely needs to be looked at, but I don’t believe in the 100% figure.
View OriginalReply0
LightningPacketLossvip
· 5h ago
100% win rate? That's too outrageous. Are there really such perfect strategies in reality?
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarkervip
· 5h ago
ngl the 100% win rate thing is giving "backtest bias" energy... like technically speaking, past performance don't guarantee future results but sure let's pretend it does lol
Reply0
SignatureVerifiervip
· 5h ago
ngl, 100% win rate on a monthly strat feels... statistically improbable? like, requires further auditing before i'd touch this tbh. insufficient validation on the underlying mechanics—what's the actual sample size here, 30 days? that's not even a market cycle lmao. classic case of potential survivorship bias masquerading as "stability"
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt