When it comes to RWA, people often only see the opportunities of asset onboarding but overlook a cold hard reality—without privacy protection, major Wall Street institutions simply won't take it seriously. Imagine, which fund manager would put their building strategies, trading timing, and position sizes all on a transparent ledger for others to scrutinize? This is the real barrier preventing institutional capital from entering.



On-chain transparency is a natural attribute, but it also creates a paradox. What enterprises and institutions need is not complete anonymity and black box secrecy, nor full disclosure, but a kind of "one-way transparency" that can demonstrate compliance to regulators while protecting sensitive business information. It sounds contradictory, but there are technical solutions.

Take Dusk as an example. Its approach is to use zero-knowledge proof technology to address this issue. Unlike some projects that treat ZK as a tool to evade regulation, Dusk takes a different path: implementing "provable privacy" through cryptography—allowing me to prove to regulators that my funds are legitimate and my holdings are compliant, while keeping specific details like exact numbers and counterparties completely confidential. This capability is almost essential for traditional financial giants.

From a technical stack perspective, Dusk has invested effort into the Piecrust virtual machine. It’s not a general-purpose computing platform but a specialized engine tailored for privacy-focused financial scenarios. While other projects are still optimizing throughput and competing on speed, Dusk is doing something more fundamental—resolving the contradiction between privacy and compliance. In this critical difference, technical strength is ultimately the key to attracting large capital.
DUSK89,83%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OvertimeSquidvip
· 12h ago
Finally, someone hit the nail on the head. Privacy is indeed the key to institutional entry... --- The folks on Wall Street have long seen through it—transparent ledgers = exposing all their secrets. Who the hell would want that? --- One-way transparency sounds fancy, but Dusk's approach is actually quite interesting. It can prove itself to the parent without revealing all the cards. --- To be honest, when it comes to ZK technology, it ultimately depends on who can truly solve the pain points of institutions, rather than just hyping concepts. --- So the question is, can this set of solutions really earn the trust of traditional finance, or is it just another wave of hype? --- I admire Piecrust's custom engine concept. Compared to projects that just stack parameters, it's definitely more advanced. --- But on the other hand, privacy + compliance sounds simple, yet actually implementing it will probably require a tough battle. --- The future of RWA probably depends on who can first resolve the contradiction of being both "hidden and transparent." It seems Dusk's approach is on the right track.
View OriginalReply0
DisillusiionOraclevip
· 12h ago
In plain terms, privacy and compliance, this pair of rivals, are finally going to make peace, otherwise institutions really won't enter the market. The idea behind Dusk indeed hits the pain point.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictimvip
· 12h ago
Ha, finally someone has spoken out. Transparent ledgers are great for retail investors, but for institutions, it's a nightmare—who wants to be exposed? This idea of "one-way transparency" is really clever; it can fool regulators while protecting oneself. Dusk's move here is quite strategic. Honestly, it's still technology that determines the ecosystem. Without resolving this contradiction, it's basically impossible for institutions to enter.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatchervip
· 12h ago
The points are quite reasonable. Privacy and compliance are indeed conflicting issues that need to be sorted out before institutions dare to enter. I think Dusk has grasped the key idea; it can prove that privacy is indeed the kind of fundamental requirement that Wall Street desires. However, to be honest, very few projects can truly achieve this kind of balance, and it remains to be seen whether they can withstand the test of time.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)