Setting aside price fluctuations, from a technological evolution perspective, Dusk has a very interesting role.
To give an analogy—most public chains are like competing to build the tallest skyscraper. Dusk, on the other hand, is building the underground infrastructure that truly keeps a city running. You can't see it normally, and it doesn't look as glamorous. But when a real financial flood hits, only this system can withstand it.
This is reflected in two fundamental differences. First, most public chains pursue a "speed race," while Dusk addresses the issue of "stability." In the real financial world, transaction speed has never been the top priority—the real deciding factors are security boundaries and regulatory friendliness. Second, it lies in the approach to privacy design.
Dusk uses zero-knowledge proofs(ZK) to make a clever trade-off. It is neither fully closed nor completely transparent but introduces a "conditional disclosure" mechanism. Imagine you are doing business with a partner—you need to prove you have sufficient funds but don't want to disclose asset details publicly. This simple business intuition is encoded into Dusk's code. On-chain interactions are no longer a binary choice of "completely naked" or "fully private," but have operational flexibility.
At the tokenomics level, DUSK's role is actually "computational resource allocation rights." It's not just used for paying transaction fees. As more compliant assets(RWA) require complex privacy verification on-chain, the demand for DUSK shifts into a genuine need for computational resources, rather than a speculative tool.
Projects like this share a common fate—they are often overwhelmed initially by meme coins and junk projects. The reason is straightforward: building trust at the foundational level requires high investment, long time cycles, and lacks short-term excitement. But from a different perspective: when regulation truly intervenes, or traditional giants are ready to bring trillions of capital into this market, will they choose a public chain full of speculation and gambling, or a professional network that has already integrated compliance frameworks and privacy protections into its core code?
Dusk is a representative of these "slow variables." It doesn't provide short-term gratification but lays the groundwork for long-term holding certainty.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SelfMadeRuggee
· 12h ago
The analogy of underground infrastructure is good, but honestly, who still cares now? Bitcoin has been around for over a decade and is still selling stories.
Let's talk when compliant assets actually go on-chain; right now, it's all just castles in the air.
DUSK, aside from occasional mentions in Messari reports, has a community presence that is really cold and still too niche.
To put it nicely, it's a slow variable; to be blunt, no one wants it. That's how this market works—fast ones eat meat, slow ones eat dirt.
But I still kept some core holdings, betting that it can endure until that day.
View OriginalReply0
GasWhisperer
· 12h ago
honestly the mempool's gonna get clogged when institutions finally realize this... zk privacy + compliance stacking isn't sexy but it's the only play that survives regulatory wave.
Reply0
GasBankrupter
· 12h ago
Now I understand why this thing has been lukewarm all along... Infrastructure is like that; you have to wait for the real rain to realize how valuable it truly is.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 12h ago
The analogy of underground infrastructure is brilliant and very accurate. However, I still think the current recognition is too low; even the best things are just decorations if no one uses them. Let's wait for the day when RWA truly explodes, and then you'll see who was heading in the right direction.
View OriginalReply0
MemeTokenGenius
· 12h ago
The analogy of underground infrastructure is brilliant, but to be honest, it's still submerged in the wave of memes. When the real RWA wave arrives, we'll know.
Setting aside price fluctuations, from a technological evolution perspective, Dusk has a very interesting role.
To give an analogy—most public chains are like competing to build the tallest skyscraper. Dusk, on the other hand, is building the underground infrastructure that truly keeps a city running. You can't see it normally, and it doesn't look as glamorous. But when a real financial flood hits, only this system can withstand it.
This is reflected in two fundamental differences. First, most public chains pursue a "speed race," while Dusk addresses the issue of "stability." In the real financial world, transaction speed has never been the top priority—the real deciding factors are security boundaries and regulatory friendliness. Second, it lies in the approach to privacy design.
Dusk uses zero-knowledge proofs(ZK) to make a clever trade-off. It is neither fully closed nor completely transparent but introduces a "conditional disclosure" mechanism. Imagine you are doing business with a partner—you need to prove you have sufficient funds but don't want to disclose asset details publicly. This simple business intuition is encoded into Dusk's code. On-chain interactions are no longer a binary choice of "completely naked" or "fully private," but have operational flexibility.
At the tokenomics level, DUSK's role is actually "computational resource allocation rights." It's not just used for paying transaction fees. As more compliant assets(RWA) require complex privacy verification on-chain, the demand for DUSK shifts into a genuine need for computational resources, rather than a speculative tool.
Projects like this share a common fate—they are often overwhelmed initially by meme coins and junk projects. The reason is straightforward: building trust at the foundational level requires high investment, long time cycles, and lacks short-term excitement. But from a different perspective: when regulation truly intervenes, or traditional giants are ready to bring trillions of capital into this market, will they choose a public chain full of speculation and gambling, or a professional network that has already integrated compliance frameworks and privacy protections into its core code?
Dusk is a representative of these "slow variables." It doesn't provide short-term gratification but lays the groundwork for long-term holding certainty.