#数字资产市场动态 The recent actions of a certain wallet platform have hurt users the most not because of a few extra fees, but because of this shift—users have gone from being "masters" to becoming "commodities." The platform can change parameters at will, turning users' assets into a profit pool ready for slaughter. This seemingly warm "big parent" style decision-making is fundamentally just the old centralized way, completely opposite to the spirit of autonomy and equality championed by Web3.
The opposite story is also happening. Some projects allow holders to truly participate—ranging from fundraising directions, collaboration details, to final execution feedback, power is decentralized into the community. Taking a charitable project in Pakistan as an example, from the proposal, fundraising, project implementation, to the final public results, every step is driven, supervised, and decided by the community. What are the benefits of this deep involvement? Holders are no longer passive spectators of reports but become genuine builders of the ecosystem. You are protecting not just the token's price fluctuations but also a collective social significance created together. In such an ecosystem, every contribution is traceable, and every action shapes the project's future.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShadowStaker
· 12h ago
nah this "community governance" thing feels nice on paper but where's the actual audit trail? seen too many projects claim transparency then it's just a few whales voting anyway
Reply0
ZKProofEnthusiast
· 12h ago
It's the same old trick again. The platform talks nicely, but then turns around and treats us like a cash machine... It's really getting on my nerves.
View OriginalReply0
DegenTherapist
· 12h ago
Another centralized entity disguised as Web3, with transaction fees just being the appetizer.
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhang
· 12h ago
It's the same old "Warm Parents" trick again; no wonder people are turning to DAOs.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropBro
· 12h ago
It's the same old story! The platform promised decentralization, but it still ends up cutting leeks. It's really just the same old trick with a different soup.
#数字资产市场动态 The recent actions of a certain wallet platform have hurt users the most not because of a few extra fees, but because of this shift—users have gone from being "masters" to becoming "commodities." The platform can change parameters at will, turning users' assets into a profit pool ready for slaughter. This seemingly warm "big parent" style decision-making is fundamentally just the old centralized way, completely opposite to the spirit of autonomy and equality championed by Web3.
The opposite story is also happening. Some projects allow holders to truly participate—ranging from fundraising directions, collaboration details, to final execution feedback, power is decentralized into the community. Taking a charitable project in Pakistan as an example, from the proposal, fundraising, project implementation, to the final public results, every step is driven, supervised, and decided by the community. What are the benefits of this deep involvement? Holders are no longer passive spectators of reports but become genuine builders of the ecosystem. You are protecting not just the token's price fluctuations but also a collective social significance created together. In such an ecosystem, every contribution is traceable, and every action shapes the project's future.