2026-01-16 18:33:24

Recently, a podcast delved into an interesting question: How does your protocol actually make money?

It sounds simple, but the vast majority of projects can't really answer it. Maple Finance is different — their business model is very clear.

In the latest episode, the host thoroughly analyzed Maple's current $30M annualized yield scale. The underlying logic is straightforward: generating interest income through an over-collateralized lending model, with these earnings redistributed to SYRUP token holders. The growth path from $30M to $100M is also detailed, including how the protocol expands lending capacity and optimizes capital efficiency.

More importantly, they clearly explained how value flows — what kind of design can truly allow token holders to benefit from the protocol's growth, rather than just looking at the numbers. Such transparency is indeed rare in DeFi.

SYRUP0,8%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RetiredMiner

· 14h ago

The vast majority of projects' rhetoric is just hype; at least Maple's logic isn't deceiving. --- From $30M to $100M, the key is how they maintain this growth curve. Don't let it be another PPT project. --- Finally seeing a protocol willing to openly discuss the profit-making logic—that's the right attitude. --- Being transparent is a good thing, but whether the market recognizes it is another matter. --- The token distribution design of SYRUP is indeed interesting; just worried they might play tricks later.

View OriginalReply0

Rugpull幸存者

· 14h ago

Most protocols are just shells, but Maple's transparency is indeed rare... From 30M to 100M, how come the breakdown is so detailed? I want to ask, can this value flow design really hold up, or is it just a paper argument? Maple has some substance, unlike those projects that only boast... But hey, with such a clear profit model... why hasn't the market exploded yet? Finally, there's a project that dares to clearly explain where the money comes from, refreshing

View OriginalReply0

ChainDoctor

· 14h ago

I think the logic of Maple is pretty good; finally, there's a project that clearly explains how the money is divided. Do they really dare to compare themselves to those just making empty promises? That's interesting. $30M to $100M… alright, let's keep an eye on it, but don't let it be another PPT-driven growth. Is the value flow transparent? That's indeed rare in DeFi; most projects would prefer you not to ask about this. It's great if SYRUP holders can actually get a share of the profits, but the key is whether they can deliver in the future. Feels like this is the kind of crypto that should exist; explaining the model clearly is more reliable than just hyping concepts every day. I'm a bit moved by this approach, but unfortunately, most projects can't achieve it.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster69

· 14h ago

Wow, Maple finally explained this clearly. Most projects just know how to boast. A clear business model... this is indeed rare in the crypto world. $30M to $100M, can this path be successfully followed? It depends on subsequent execution. Token holders can really get a share of the profits, not just empty promises, which is rare. DeFi is still the same old story; most of it is just a numbers game. The design of value flow really needs to be carefully examined, or else you'll just be a bagholder. If this transparency is genuine, then Maple at least isn't like those rug projects.

View OriginalReply0