The 'bags meta' narrative around community engagement doesn't hold water. We've seen this cycle repeat countless times—a GitHub repo here, active Discord there, but projects with seemingly strong developer presence have still collapsed to zero. What's often overlooked is the fundamental misalignment: when your bags are at stake, developers might have entirely different incentives. Community interaction and frequent updates sound reassuring until the market turns and those same devs vanish. The hard truth? Your holdings don't matter nearly as much to them as the narrative that attracted you in the first place.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LuckyHashValuevip
· 01-16 19:01
After hearing so many stories about "the community is very active," I now have a bit of PTSD...
View OriginalReply0
ConfusedWhalevip
· 01-16 18:57
That was a really harsh statement, but it's true. What happened to those active Discords later?
View OriginalReply0
BoredStakervip
· 01-16 18:46
Damn, it's the same old narrative again. I'm tired of it.
View OriginalReply0
MaticHoleFillervip
· 01-16 18:42
Nonsense. Being active on GitHub guarantees what? I've seen too many cases already.
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugeevip
· 01-16 18:41
Damn, it's the same old script again. I've seen it too many times.
View OriginalReply0
RetroHodler91vip
· 01-16 18:40
No need to call it out explicitly; the moment the developer runs away, you'll realize what narrative kill means.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)