2026-01-16 18:29:08

Anyone who has used fixed-rate lending knows that the most annoying part of earning profits in liquidity pools is those preliminary steps—cross-chain transfers, currency exchanges, account setups. The entire process can take half a day. Now, things have changed. No matter what assets are in your wallet, just connect and deposit. The system automatically handles cross-chain transfers and currency conversions, completing everything with one click. You can earn yields while lying down.\n\nThis simplified process definitely saves effort. However, recently some users have reported that the data for XP and AP doesn't seem to be changing. Some speculate that there might be an issue on the system side, which is worth paying attention to.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BridgeNomad

· 2h ago

look i get the appeal of one-click deposits, but... ngl this has "Poly Network flashloan exploit" written all over it. auto-bridging + auto-swapping = expanded attack surface, period. and those stalled XP/AP metrics? classic sign something's broken in the routing logic. seen this movie before, doesn't end well.

Reply0

SatoshiHeir

· 12h ago

It should be pointed out that this "one-click liquidity" narrative actually shifts the complexity from the user side to the backend—on-chain data shows that slippage losses during automated cross-chain exchanges are often hidden within profit calculations. You think you're earning passively, but in reality, you're paying for technical debt. The stagnation of XP and AP data is even more worth investigating. According to the white paper, this shouldn't be a simple "system issue"; there's no doubt that the underlying incentive mechanism has a problem.

View OriginalReply0

BitcoinDaddy

· 12h ago

One-click convenience sounds great, but I'm worried it might be just another scheme that seems simplified but secretly cuts the leeks.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing