When mentioning Dusk Foundation, many people's first thoughts are privacy, public chains, zero-knowledge proofs, and other related tags. But in reality, if you only focus on the concept of "privacy chain," you will completely miss the true goal of this project.
Dusk's real solution is not just the generic privacy transaction issue, but a more challenging and practical problem: how compliant finance can operate on the blockchain.
The bottleneck of traditional finance is not speed, but complexity. Behind every security, debt claim, or equity are a whole set of processes including KYC verification, investor authentication, transfer restrictions, information disclosure, and jurisdiction. These are not due to public chains being unwilling, but because most simply cannot do them.
What is Dusk's approach? It's not about exposing everything to the sunlight, but about transparency where needed and secrecy where necessary—the key is that the entire process must withstand mathematical verification. This is its true ambition.
But this is also where the problem lies.
Dusk's narrative framework is quite heavy, and the difficulty of getting started is equally high. It is not a chain aimed at retail users but designed for institutions, financial issuers, and compliance developers. In other words, its growth will not explode suddenly like meme coins or DeFi projects, but will be slow, cumbersome, and difficult to tell stories about, making it hard for the market to digest.
Conversely, the position of the DUSK token is also quite awkward. It does not belong to a purely speculative narrative but is a necessary component for network operation—used for validation, privacy computation, and network rewards. These types of tokens often face a problem: usefulness does not necessarily mean price appreciation.
Therefore, my conclusion is: Dusk is not the kind of project that can multiply tenfold in a few weeks, but if it survives, it will last a long time.
It has never been designed for those chasing hot trends, but for those who believe that "blockchain will eventually be incorporated into the regulatory framework."
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleStalker
· 5h ago
Speaking frankly, the problem is who would buy this... institutional players? Forget it, they have private equity.
---
Compliance + privacy is indeed a combo that no one is doing, but making money is also difficult, and slow-burning projects like DUSK really test holders' patience.
---
So ultimately, it's just a boring infrastructure token, no story, no imagination, no wonder no one is hyping it.
---
Wait, how does it even fight the SEC... If it really becomes a regulatory winner, retail investors will regret it too late.
---
Honestly, I prefer projects that directly target institutional funding. Dusk's approach is too forward-thinking; it might not even live to see the day it gets adopted.
---
Got it, it's that kind of "might be useful in ten years, so don't touch it now" thing. Still, meme hype is more fun.
---
If any big institution takes over Dusk, the situation could turn around. The key now is, who dares to be the first to take the plunge?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatorFlash
· 15h ago
Sounds good, but how should the collateralization ratio be designed? Retail investors simply can't hold onto this long-term narrative, and liquidation risk can be triggered at any moment.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 15h ago
Got it. Dusk is the kind of institutional toy; retail investors buying it is just a waste. Regulatory finance sounds grand, but the market simply won't buy into it unless big institutions really step in.
---
Honestly, the biggest risk for projects like this is that the story can't be told effectively. Coins without a narrative, no matter how hardcore the gains, are useless.
---
So it's the same old story: coins with real applications are actually the hardest to succeed. If Dusk truly survives, that would be a winner, but talking about that now is a bit too far ahead.
---
Basically, it's a gamble that governments will recognize blockchain, and that's a pretty big bet.
---
The idea of institutional finance going on-chain is indeed promising, but DUSK as an asset feels like the investment logic is too complicated; ordinary people simply can't play with it.
---
Compliance frameworks and such, just hearing about them makes you realize these are things five or ten years down the line. If you get in now, you're just a side player, right?
---
I just want to know, how many institutions are really waiting for this? Feels like the narrative is way ahead of reality.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuy
· 15h ago
To be honest, this is the real deal, but retail investors probably won't listen... People looking to quickly tenfold their investments will probably lose interest after reading this article.
When mentioning Dusk Foundation, many people's first thoughts are privacy, public chains, zero-knowledge proofs, and other related tags. But in reality, if you only focus on the concept of "privacy chain," you will completely miss the true goal of this project.
Dusk's real solution is not just the generic privacy transaction issue, but a more challenging and practical problem: how compliant finance can operate on the blockchain.
The bottleneck of traditional finance is not speed, but complexity. Behind every security, debt claim, or equity are a whole set of processes including KYC verification, investor authentication, transfer restrictions, information disclosure, and jurisdiction. These are not due to public chains being unwilling, but because most simply cannot do them.
What is Dusk's approach? It's not about exposing everything to the sunlight, but about transparency where needed and secrecy where necessary—the key is that the entire process must withstand mathematical verification. This is its true ambition.
But this is also where the problem lies.
Dusk's narrative framework is quite heavy, and the difficulty of getting started is equally high. It is not a chain aimed at retail users but designed for institutions, financial issuers, and compliance developers. In other words, its growth will not explode suddenly like meme coins or DeFi projects, but will be slow, cumbersome, and difficult to tell stories about, making it hard for the market to digest.
Conversely, the position of the DUSK token is also quite awkward. It does not belong to a purely speculative narrative but is a necessary component for network operation—used for validation, privacy computation, and network rewards. These types of tokens often face a problem: usefulness does not necessarily mean price appreciation.
Therefore, my conclusion is: Dusk is not the kind of project that can multiply tenfold in a few weeks, but if it survives, it will last a long time.
It has never been designed for those chasing hot trends, but for those who believe that "blockchain will eventually be incorporated into the regulatory framework."