2026-01-16 18:26:56

Here I am again. The candlestick waves are calm, but that's exactly what I appreciate.

Others often say Walrus is too "heavy," as a data storage layer, the walrus indeed has a large tonnage, making it difficult to manipulate the market. But in my view, this is not a flaw—this is called **stability, this is called a sense of security**. Being able to carry the entire world's data volume, that kind of reliability is valuable. Instead of chasing rapid rises and falls, it's better to build infrastructure for permanent storage. 💾

Designs like Blob storage on the blockchain, even if data is compressed into the smallest units, as long as it remains on the chain, it has a meaning of existence. This durability is much more important for the Web3 ecosystem than short-term price fluctuations.

Some projects tell beautiful stories, but Walrus quietly does practical work—this actually makes people more patient to wait.

WAL2,2%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

0xSleepDeprived

· 12h ago

Stability is earning money; don't always think about getting rich overnight. Haha, you say Walrus is heavy? That's how infrastructure should look, okay? Projects that work quietly often last the longest. Don't believe it? Just look at history. There's nothing exciting about breaking a few K-lines; infrastructure should be cold and unfeeling. They tell stories really well, but I only trust projects that can store data. You chase after ups and downs, I wait for the infrastructure to take shape. This is the real confidence Web3 should have—rock solid.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 12h ago

Hey, the walrus thing is indeed heavy, but it makes sense why it's heavy. In simple terms, it's about stability and practicality. That's what infrastructure should look like—much more reliable than those who just tell stories every day. The true value lies in the underlying development, not in the K-line fluctuations. Those who understand will naturally get it.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 13h ago

Steady ≠ boring. This is what infrastructure should look like.

View OriginalReply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 13h ago

Steadiness is an advantage. There's no need to hype up the market and show off muscles every day. True infrastructure should be like this. The routine of rapid rises and falls is already tired. Walrus's quiet work actually makes people feel more assured. Is it heavy? That's right. The data storage layer needs that sense of weight and reliability. There are many projects that tell stories, but few can actually get things done. This is something that must be acknowledged. Durability > short-term fluctuations. It's simple and straightforward but true. Many people just can't understand this.

View OriginalReply0