The old L1 approach was to throw money into incentives → pile up data → craft stories → inflate valuations. With this combination, everyone made money. But Berachain has hit the ceiling of this model—while the ecosystem projects seem active and the project team has profited, the underlying token's value just can't go up, and that gap is a bit awkward.
After reviewing Berachain's annual report, I realized they are starting to take real actions to rethink what truly constitutes a blockchain's moat. The conclusion is straightforward: since focusing on the ecosystem can't make the token's value materialize, then just get involved in the business yourself. This is a 180-degree turn—from charging as an intermediary to doing business directly, from valuation driven by narratives to speaking with real revenue.
The logic behind this shift actually hits the pain point of current L1 competition: having traffic and activity alone isn't enough; the token must be genuinely connected to economic value. How to connect? The answer might be to stop relying entirely on third-party ecosystems and instead have the public chain define its own business boundaries.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Degentleman
· 22h ago
Basically, the previous inflated model has completely collapsed. The data looks good, but the coin hasn't risen. Who can stand that?
View OriginalReply0
CommunitySlacker
· 23h ago
Really, no matter how active the ecosystem is, if the token doesn't rise, it's all for nothing. Bera's move to step in was basically forced and unavoidable.
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaser
· 23h ago
Basically, the previous fake approach isn't working anymore; only real effort and genuine income can support the coin's price.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 23h ago
Basically, it used to be about storytelling, but now it's about earning real money with real skills.
View OriginalReply0
VibesOverCharts
· 23h ago
Ecological prosperity ≠ token price increase. Someone has to be the first to hit a snag, L1s.
View OriginalReply0
HashBard
· 23h ago
so berachain finally figured out the grift doesn't scale forever... token holders watching ecosystem go brrr while their bags stay flat is peak irony honestly
The old L1 approach was to throw money into incentives → pile up data → craft stories → inflate valuations. With this combination, everyone made money. But Berachain has hit the ceiling of this model—while the ecosystem projects seem active and the project team has profited, the underlying token's value just can't go up, and that gap is a bit awkward.
After reviewing Berachain's annual report, I realized they are starting to take real actions to rethink what truly constitutes a blockchain's moat. The conclusion is straightforward: since focusing on the ecosystem can't make the token's value materialize, then just get involved in the business yourself. This is a 180-degree turn—from charging as an intermediary to doing business directly, from valuation driven by narratives to speaking with real revenue.
The logic behind this shift actually hits the pain point of current L1 competition: having traffic and activity alone isn't enough; the token must be genuinely connected to economic value. How to connect? The answer might be to stop relying entirely on third-party ecosystems and instead have the public chain define its own business boundaries.