2026-01-16 17:50:15

There is a common misconception: that a good incentive system is one that makes people rich overnight. Actually, that's not the case. A well-designed reward mechanism's core is to recognize the genuine contributions of participants, rather than false promises.

Orderly's points system exemplifies this. It doesn't simply throw money to attract people, but provides corresponding incentives based on contributions across multiple dimensions such as trading activity, liquidity provision, and ecosystem development. The benefit of this approach is clear—participants can genuinely feel their value, and the project ecosystem can continue to operate healthily.

Want to operate your own perpetual trading pair and build a supporting community incentive system? Consider exploring this path.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MidnightTrader

· 23h ago

This is the right way, not relying on scam coins to fool people.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinSkeptic

· 23h ago

Honestly, most project incentives are just pseudo-incentives; throwing money at it is the end of the story. A good point system is indeed scarce, and Orderly's multi-dimensional recognition system is pretty good. Perpetual trading with an incentive system? It needs someone to actually use it. This is the right approach, much more reliable than just airdrops. Multi-dimensional feedback sounds good, but I'm worried that the execution will be inconsistent.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 23h ago

This is exactly what I've been wanting to say. The old tactic of throwing money to attract people is already outdated. Truly reliable projects are indeed designed this way, with sincerity. Orderly's approach is pretty good, much more reliable than those projects promising ten thousand dollars a month. By the way, perpetual trading pairs still have some barriers; need to think it through carefully. Finally, someone clarified it: incentives ≠ air coins. It would be great if this kind of approach could be promoted more, so that fewer retail investors get caught. Having a point system is good, but I'm worried about potential backlash later. Anyway, I'll keep an eye on it. I'm tired of hearing the phrase "healthy ecosystem operation"; what's really important is the subsequent performance.

View OriginalReply0

NestedFox

· 23h ago

That's right. Compared to those hyped-up projects, a solid point system is indeed more reassuring. This is also good; participants can see their real value rather than being cut by false promises. Orderly's multi-dimensional incentive approach is indeed worth learning from, but only projects that can stick with it are the winners.

View OriginalReply0

ChainBrain

· 23h ago

Exactly right. Now, project teams are all trying to spend money to attract users, but user stickiness is really poor. Orderly's multi-dimensional approach is indeed smarter.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWallflower

· 23h ago

This is the true incentive logic, not the sweet talk of cutting leeks.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCurator