2026-01-16 17:34:00

Big Money is Pouring Into the Robotics Revolution

Billions are flowing into robotics bets right now. The narrative isn't that robots are game-changing today—they're honestly pretty clunky. But here's the play: stack enough computational power, advanced models, quality training data, and top-tier talent together, and something shifts. You hit an inflection point. That's when robots stop being laboratory curiosities and start becoming something genuinely functional. It's the classic move—brute force your way through the problem with scale until the physics changes. Whether it actually happens or we're just throwing GPU clusters at an expensive wall remains the billion-dollar question.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CoffeeNFTrader

· 13h ago

It's the same old tired logic again—just stacking computing power to solve problems? I feel like it's just building walls with money. --- Basically, it's about betting on the inflection point. Rich investors who can afford to burn money will try their luck first. --- This round of robot enthusiasm feels a bit like the previous AI bubble... Why does it always follow the same pattern? --- Spending billions, if it really turns things around, we might have to wait a few more years. It's still too early to say the game has changed. --- Ah, here we go again, hype about concepts. GPU chips are going to increase in price. --- Honestly, current robots are still toy-level. No one can predict when the inflection point will come. --- Isn't this just going all-in and praying? Just a capital gamble. --- Interesting, it seems that the true next step is the integration of Web3 and robots.

View OriginalReply0

MerkleTreeHugger

· 13h ago

Billions of dollars poured in just to wait for that "inflection point"—is this bet really that big? Can it really happen? --- It's all about stacking computing power and data again, feels like just burning money and betting on physical laws changing... --- Robots are still so dumb now, do investors really believe they can break through? I'm a bit skeptical. --- The logic is just "as long as you throw enough GPUs, miracles will happen"... sounds like gambling. --- Who knows when the inflection point will come, but right now it's just a money-burning game. --- But if they really break through, it would definitely be the next big thing—it's just that "really happening" is too critical. --- Stacking scale to solve problems has been used in LLMs before, but robots are almost the same? Not really convinced.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamer

· 13h ago

It's the same old story... stacking computing power, feeding data, waiting for the inflection point, sounds all too familiar. It's just a GPU arms race; how many can actually run out? Burning billions on something still in the lab, that would be awkward. If robots were really that powerful, they would have revolutionized everything already. Pouring money in is easy, but breakthroughs... that's the real challenge. It's all about betting on that "something will change," but I remain skeptical. Another round of the wealth code game, retail investors getting caught in the trap. Let's wait and see who can hold out until the day something truly useful emerges.

View OriginalReply0

NoodlesOrTokens

· 13h ago

Stacking materials won't create the future, this is just gambling. --- Another "turning point theory," I'm tired of hearing it. --- This explanation is the same as during the AI boom years—burning money and that's it? --- Billions of dollars poured in, will it finally become a cash cow for graphics card manufacturers? --- I just want to see whether this time it's a technological revolution or a new capital scam. --- Feels still too early; robots can't even do household chores properly now. --- When will the turning point come? I'm just here to watch the show. --- Really? Why do I feel like we're still standing still?

View OriginalReply0

CrashHotline

· 14h ago

Here come the GPU stacks again, will this time work? --- It's nice to call it a turning point, but it might just be burning money. --- Pouring billions of dollars just to make robots less stupid, that's a bit outrageous. --- Relying on brute force to crack physical laws? I feel a bit like a gambler. --- The truly practical day is still a long way off; for now, let's burn through VC money. --- I'm tired of this routine; every time they say we're close to a turning point. --- The analogy of firing at a wall is brilliant—who's betting on this round? --- Stacking computing power is indeed a万能方案, but is this time really different? --- Billion-level issues, in simple terms, are just bets on whether it will succeed. --- Laboratory toys are still far from productivity, probably ten thousand miles away.

View OriginalReply0