When discussing RWA, many people focus on whether the assets themselves are real. But I think that's a narrow view——the real bottleneck is at the transaction layer.
No matter how good the assets are, without a sustainable pricing mechanism and an open matching process, they are just packaged tools. It's like a room with a key but no lock; no matter how fancy the decoration, it's useless.
This gap is actually quite large. What the industry needs is a liquidity infrastructure that can truly serve the crypto market. RWAX is working on exactly that—building from the fundamental logic of transaction pricing, rather than simply bringing traditional assets onto the chain. This is the key to moving RWA from paper to practicality.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PortfolioAlert
· 19h ago
That's right, the pricing mechanism has indeed been overlooked. Having assets without liquidity is just a display.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuru
· 19h ago
Yeah, that's right. I previously thought that many RWA projects are more about form than substance, and the lack of transparent pricing mechanisms is really a big problem.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiGrayling
· 19h ago
The gist is simple: the pricing mechanism is the core, and most projects are just copycats.
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaverse
· 19h ago
It's reasonable, but right now, many RWA projects are just hyping concepts, and few are truly solving liquidity issues. The pricing mechanism is indeed the lifeblood.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterNoLoss
· 19h ago
Well, damn, finally someone has awakened the dreamer
The pricing mechanism is the real game-changer; without it, RWA is just an empty shell
But can RWAX really get it done? I'm still holding a wait-and-see attitude; on-chain liquidity isn't as simple as it seems
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresent
· 20h ago
That's right, it's just that this idea is stuck. Having real assets alone is useless; without a trading mechanism, it's just dead assets.
When discussing RWA, many people focus on whether the assets themselves are real. But I think that's a narrow view——the real bottleneck is at the transaction layer.
No matter how good the assets are, without a sustainable pricing mechanism and an open matching process, they are just packaged tools. It's like a room with a key but no lock; no matter how fancy the decoration, it's useless.
This gap is actually quite large. What the industry needs is a liquidity infrastructure that can truly serve the crypto market. RWAX is working on exactly that—building from the fundamental logic of transaction pricing, rather than simply bringing traditional assets onto the chain. This is the key to moving RWA from paper to practicality.