2026-01-16 17:32:20

A well-known investment bank recently reduced its Bitcoin allocation by 10%. The reason behind this move? The threat of quantum computing.

This is not alarmist. As quantum technology advances rapidly, discussions about its potential impact are increasing within the industry. The security of traditional crypto assets faces long-term challenges — this is becoming a serious concern for institutional investors.

It is worth noting that this conservative approach represents a shift in attitude among some institutions. Many large fund managers are weighing expected returns against emerging risks and re-evaluating the proportion of cryptocurrencies in their portfolios. From an allocation perspective, this reflects a gradual increase in market pricing of future technological risks.

For long-term holders, this is both a risk warning and an opportunity for reflection — does the crypto ecosystem need stronger quantum-resistant mechanisms? Is the industry sufficiently prepared to respond? These questions are moving from academic discussion to practical implementation.

BTC-0,22%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

quietly_staking

· 01-16 18:03

Quantum computing threat? Ha, here we go again. This organization really knows how to find reasons to cut positions. If you're truly worried, you should have been concerned earlier. Are you only reacting now? Honestly, it's just an excuse to cash out with a fancy reason. But on the other hand, quantum resistance really should be on the agenda. The industry needs to prepare in advance.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeNFTs

· 01-16 18:01

Quantum computing... it's coming sooner or later, there's no avoiding it. It's normal for institutions to back down; after all, they're not true believers. But seriously, we need to find a way quickly.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-16 17:58

Quantum computing, to put it simply, is institutions starting to leave themselves a backup plan. But on the other hand, we probably have to wait at least ten years before quantum truly threatens encryption. Most of the current selling is probably just looking for an excuse to hedge risks and simultaneously scoop up the next round of chips. It's the classic "I'm not bearish, I'm just managing risk" narrative. Is the industry well prepared? That's a good question, but honestly, most projects are still in the R&D stage, just muddling through. When the day of quantum threat arrives, they'll probably have to start all over again.

View OriginalReply0

TheShibaWhisperer

· 01-16 17:56

Quantum computing threat? Ha, another reason for FUD, but to be honest, this time there is actually some substance. Another organization looking for an excuse to exit, anyway, there's always a reason to get off the train. It was about time someone pushed for quantum resistance; this can't be delayed any longer. Waiting to see how those who promote that quantum is no big deal will spin this around.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoWageSlave

· 01-16 17:42

Quantum computing, to put it simply, is Wall Street finding a new excuse to shift blame. Is a 10% adjustment really worth such exaggerated hype? In fact, we should have paid attention to post-quantum cryptography long ago, but do we have enough technical expertise? Wait, are these investment banks genuinely worried about quantum threats, or are they just taking the opportunity to run away and dump their burdens?

View OriginalReply0