Traditional financial institutions resist enabling consumers to access high-yield savings alternatives. Meanwhile, crypto projects rush to launch low-quality tokens seeking quick profits through retail participation. Meanwhile, Bitcoin's open-source developers and the principle of self-custody rights find themselves squeezed between these conflicting forces—caught between legacy finance barriers and market exploitation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xSoulless
· 1h ago
Both sides want to cut, it's like chives in a sandwich cookie.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomMiner
· 15h ago
Both sides want to harvest the leeks, truly incredible.
View OriginalReply0
0xSunnyDay
· 15h ago
Being caught in the middle is the hardest, both sides want to have it, developers have it tough.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysMissingTops
· 15h ago
Being caught in the middle is really tough, but isn't that what we're trying to do—to break this deadlock?
Traditional financial institutions resist enabling consumers to access high-yield savings alternatives. Meanwhile, crypto projects rush to launch low-quality tokens seeking quick profits through retail participation. Meanwhile, Bitcoin's open-source developers and the principle of self-custody rights find themselves squeezed between these conflicting forces—caught between legacy finance barriers and market exploitation.