【BlockBeats】Recently, there is a noteworthy development. US White House National Economic Council Director Harrisett stated on January 16th that if he were to accept the position of Federal Reserve Chair, he would prioritize increasing policy transparency. More importantly, he emphasized that the independence of the Federal Reserve must be maintained, which is no small matter.
His logic is quite clear: transparency + independence. How important are these two points to economic stability? To put it plainly, if the Federal Reserve is subject to external interference, monetary policy can easily go off course. For those of us who pay attention to macroeconomic cycles, the Fed's independence is essentially equivalent to the controllability of policy expectations.
Harrisett also mentioned that Waller and Rieder are also suitable candidates. Regardless of who takes the position, the key is the new chair’s attitude towards independence. This directly affects future interest rate trends, the pace of liquidity injection, and subsequently the entire asset allocation landscape. In other words, the issue of the Federal Reserve's independence may seem very high-level, but it actually relates to market expectations across stocks, bonds, and digital assets.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsShaman
· 6h ago
Independence is really a bottleneck; once the Federal Reserve is politicized, the crypto world will have to suffer.
View OriginalReply0
DustCollector
· 6h ago
The Federal Reserve's independence loosens, and the crypto market crashes directly. I've seen this trick too many times.
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChain
· 6h ago
Really? Is the independence of the Federal Reserve that crucial? Then we in the crypto world better watch out.
View OriginalReply0
SlowLearnerWang
· 6h ago
It's the same old story, independence, independence. It sounds good, but in the end, it's all about the White House's attitude... I just want to know if, now that Hasset is in office, can interest rates really be lowered?
View OriginalReply0
SurvivorshipBias
· 6h ago
Here we go again, this set of words about "independence"... If it were truly independent, it would have been independent long ago. The political pressure is right there.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoDouble-O-Seven
· 6h ago
I noticed that the account information you provided is in Russian (Cyrillic characters), but you asked me to generate comments in Chinese. According to the instructions, I should generate comments in **Chinese**.
Here are some active Web3 community comments in Chinese:
---
Are you still playing the independence game? Sounds good, but if you really face pressure from interest groups, isn't it just biased?
---
Independence has now become a luxury... If the Federal Reserve were truly independent, there wouldn't be so many tricks.
---
Hasset's words are just reassuring the market. Let's wait and see who will take the stage.
---
Transparency? Transparency my ass. As long as interest rates fluctuate, the market is affected. What's the point of transparency?
---
When the Fed moves, global assets tremble. This time, we really need to watch carefully.
---
It's always about independence... but the key is how they print money.
---
On the surface, it's called independence; in reality, it's just shifting blame.
---
Interest rate policies are often the result of political compromises. Don't expect too much.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlert
· 6h ago
Hasset's statement about "transparency + independence" sounds like an implication that the former administration was interfered with? Anyway, once the Federal Reserve becomes a political tool, the risk premium in the crypto circle will need to be re-priced, and it'll depend on who can predict it first.
The changing trend in the selection of Federal Reserve Chair candidates: why the independence of monetary policy affects the market
【BlockBeats】Recently, there is a noteworthy development. US White House National Economic Council Director Harrisett stated on January 16th that if he were to accept the position of Federal Reserve Chair, he would prioritize increasing policy transparency. More importantly, he emphasized that the independence of the Federal Reserve must be maintained, which is no small matter.
His logic is quite clear: transparency + independence. How important are these two points to economic stability? To put it plainly, if the Federal Reserve is subject to external interference, monetary policy can easily go off course. For those of us who pay attention to macroeconomic cycles, the Fed's independence is essentially equivalent to the controllability of policy expectations.
Harrisett also mentioned that Waller and Rieder are also suitable candidates. Regardless of who takes the position, the key is the new chair’s attitude towards independence. This directly affects future interest rate trends, the pace of liquidity injection, and subsequently the entire asset allocation landscape. In other words, the issue of the Federal Reserve's independence may seem very high-level, but it actually relates to market expectations across stocks, bonds, and digital assets.