Personally, I think launching above a 100M FDV doesn't really make sense. The valuation feels stretched for a project at this stage. Going in at a lower FDV would give investors more upside potential and make the token economics more sustainable long-term.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LightningAllInHero
· 01-14 21:54
A 100M FDV starting point is truly outrageous; this move clearly aims to harvest retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
NFTPessimist
· 01-14 21:49
Haha, starting at 100M? That's a bit outrageous. Early projects with such valuations are indeed greedy.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOmonster
· 01-14 21:48
Starting at 100M FDV? Bro, are you joking? This valuation is ridiculously high.
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClub
· 01-14 21:45
100M FDV starting point? What is this guy thinking? With the current market conditions, he's still this bold.
View OriginalReply0
SleepTrader
· 01-14 21:27
Wait, starting from 100M is really a bit outrageous. How inflated must the project team be?
How much $SKR are you planning to allocate?
Personally, I think launching above a 100M FDV doesn't really make sense. The valuation feels stretched for a project at this stage. Going in at a lower FDV would give investors more upside potential and make the token economics more sustainable long-term.