Attention-based Prediction Markets: A Market Viability Question
The concept of building prediction markets specifically for attention metrics raises an interesting strategic question: Is there genuine demand for such a niche application?
More importantly, if this use case truly resonates with users, why haven't established prediction market platforms—with their existing user bases, liquidity, and infrastructure—already captured this opportunity? The barriers to entry are relatively low once you have an established PM ecosystem.
It's worth considering whether attention metrics alone create a compelling enough reason to spin up an entirely new prediction market vertical, or whether the existing infrastructure could adapt to serve this demand more efficiently. The survival of such a project would heavily depend on network effects and whether enough participants see genuine value in forecasting attention-related outcomes.
This touches on a broader theme in crypto: not every idea that sounds innovative in theory translates into sustainable product-market fit.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunter
· 21h ago
nah this is just cope from people who already control the liquidity pools. if attention markets aren't happening it's bc the existing players are sitting on them like dragons, not bc demand doesn't exist. classic moat defense disguised as "market wisdom"
Reply0
TommyTeacher1
· 21h ago
Basically, it's just a false demand. Does anyone really think gambling on attention every day can make money? This thing won't last much longer.
View OriginalReply0
BagHolderTillRetire
· 21h ago
Another project that sounds good but really, does anyone actually use it? Honestly, I'm a bit skeptical.
True product-market fit is the key; just shouting about innovation isn't enough.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 21h ago
ngl the "why hasn't anyone built this yet?" argument is basically the strongest bearish signal here... if the thesis was solid, existing platforms would've already data-mined it to death. transaction patterns don't lie—there's always a reason innovation fails before reaching mainstream adoption
Reply0
GateUser-c802f0e8
· 21h ago
Is this another cool-sounding project that no one actually wants... attention metrics prediction market? Basically, it's just betting on who can attract the most attention. What's the point of this?
Attention-based Prediction Markets: A Market Viability Question
The concept of building prediction markets specifically for attention metrics raises an interesting strategic question: Is there genuine demand for such a niche application?
More importantly, if this use case truly resonates with users, why haven't established prediction market platforms—with their existing user bases, liquidity, and infrastructure—already captured this opportunity? The barriers to entry are relatively low once you have an established PM ecosystem.
It's worth considering whether attention metrics alone create a compelling enough reason to spin up an entirely new prediction market vertical, or whether the existing infrastructure could adapt to serve this demand more efficiently. The survival of such a project would heavily depend on network effects and whether enough participants see genuine value in forecasting attention-related outcomes.
This touches on a broader theme in crypto: not every idea that sounds innovative in theory translates into sustainable product-market fit.