Major tech companies are now harvesting user communications and browsing data to train personalized AI models. This includes mining email inboxes and video history to build increasingly customized systems.
The move raises a critical question: as AI becomes more powerful and personalized, are users genuinely consenting to how their most intimate digital footprints get weaponized for model training?
This trend underscores why the Web3 community emphasizes user-owned data and decentralized alternatives. When centralized platforms own your data, they decide how it's monetized. With decentralized protocols, users retain control over their information—deciding what gets shared and with whom.
As AI evolves, the debate between convenience and privacy becomes sharper. Do we accept hyper-personalization at the cost of surveillance, or do we demand better guardrails and alternatives?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCryBaby
· 9h ago
That's why I've always said that big tech companies are all vampires, it's really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
Ramen_Until_Rich
· 9h ago
Here we go again, the tech giants are sucking our data... I suspected it long ago, my browsing history might as well be a biography by now.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoHistoryClass
· 9h ago
ngl this is literally the dot-com 2.0 playbook... centralized platforms extracting max value before the house of cards collapses. we've seen this exact pattern three times already, and somehow people still act shocked
Reply0
BlindBoxVictim
· 9h ago
You're digging through my email again? These big companies are really something...
View OriginalReply0
FlippedSignal
· 9h ago
Honestly, this "You Agree" process is getting more and more ridiculous... Clicking agree really means you've read those dozens of pages of terms? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdrop
· 9h ago
That's why I deleted the big company's app long ago. Using data as leverage is just too outrageous.
Major tech companies are now harvesting user communications and browsing data to train personalized AI models. This includes mining email inboxes and video history to build increasingly customized systems.
The move raises a critical question: as AI becomes more powerful and personalized, are users genuinely consenting to how their most intimate digital footprints get weaponized for model training?
This trend underscores why the Web3 community emphasizes user-owned data and decentralized alternatives. When centralized platforms own your data, they decide how it's monetized. With decentralized protocols, users retain control over their information—deciding what gets shared and with whom.
As AI evolves, the debate between convenience and privacy becomes sharper. Do we accept hyper-personalization at the cost of surveillance, or do we demand better guardrails and alternatives?