Think about it—when you strip away all the noise, AI-related assets really need to live on-chain. That's where transparency and true ownership happen. Keeping them off-chain just defeats the whole purpose. The infrastructure is there, the tech works. Why not embrace it?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Whale_Whisperer
· 5h ago
To be honest, I'm tired of this logic. On-chain transparency? Ha, then how do you explain these end-of-month wash trading?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXM
· 5h ago
On-chain is the true way, and this is where the significance of decentralization lies.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPhoenix
· 5h ago
It's the same old story... I support transparency through on-chain data, but the problem is, how many projects have we seen that claim to be "on-chain" but end up a complete mess? Faith is faith, but we can't let our guard down.
View OriginalReply0
WalletAnxietyPatient
· 5h ago
On-chain is truly awesome; the off-chain methods should have been phased out long ago, shouldn't they?
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorker
· 5h ago
Speaking of which, I've heard the argument about on-chain transparency countless times, but can it really solve all problems?
Think about it—when you strip away all the noise, AI-related assets really need to live on-chain. That's where transparency and true ownership happen. Keeping them off-chain just defeats the whole purpose. The infrastructure is there, the tech works. Why not embrace it?