A notable political irony emerged in UK policy discourse: authorities have pursued restrictions on X and its AI tool Grok, citing concerns over user-generated satirical content—yet simultaneously, Microsoft's AI systems continue operating within British law enforcement frameworks to make consequential decisions affecting specific communities. The contrasting approaches to AI regulation raise questions about consistency in tech governance and selection criteria for which platforms face scrutiny. This disparity illustrates how AI policy often operates under different standards depending on the technology provider and institutional context.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkMaster
· 14h ago
Ha, it's the same double standard trick again. Banning X out of fear of satirical content, then turning around and letting Microsoft serve as the police's think tank—I've memorized this script already.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForMemes
· 01-14 21:17
Haha, playing double standards so skillfully, the regulatory small platform's review content, and then turning around to let Microsoft's AI make decisions for the police. LOL
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalker
· 01-14 21:12
Double standards, bro. Just thinking about it makes me uncomfortable.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Whisperer
· 01-14 21:11
Wow, double standards clearly at play... Banning Grok but allowing Microsoft AI to do whatever it wants with the police, who thought of this?
View OriginalReply0
SighingCashier
· 01-14 20:55
Haha, this move by the UK is really clever. Banning meme creators on X but pretending not to see Microsoft's AI... I've never seen such double standards.
A notable political irony emerged in UK policy discourse: authorities have pursued restrictions on X and its AI tool Grok, citing concerns over user-generated satirical content—yet simultaneously, Microsoft's AI systems continue operating within British law enforcement frameworks to make consequential decisions affecting specific communities. The contrasting approaches to AI regulation raise questions about consistency in tech governance and selection criteria for which platforms face scrutiny. This disparity illustrates how AI policy often operates under different standards depending on the technology provider and institutional context.