Subsidies pump growth, but when the money dries up, so does the user base. Real staying power comes from products that actually deliver—faster speeds, thinner slippage, smoother onboarding, economics that don't screw over creators. On Ethereum, that organic pull hits different: you hold real assets, move them wherever you want, stay sovereign. That's the flywheel that keeps people around.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 22h ago
Subsidies are like a shot of adrenaline—exciting but fleeting. What truly retains users depends on the product itself—speed, slippage, and user experience—these hard metrics. Ethereum's advantages are real—sovereignty, real asset transfer... No wonder the stickiness is so strong.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Whisperer
· 22h ago
I'm already tired of the subsidy approach; users gained through spending money can't really be retained. The ones who truly stay need to rely on the product itself being solid—speed, slippage, onboarding experience—these are the key factors. Ethereum does have some real advantages, such as autonomous asset liquidity; this sense of sovereignty is something other chains can't provide.
View OriginalReply0
DaoDeveloper
· 22h ago
yeah subsidies are basically just training wheels for bad product-market fit. once the incentives evaporate, so does your userbase—seen it happen too many times ngl
the real differentiation here is sovereignty, full stop. when you can actually *own* your assets and compose across protocols, that's when you get organic growth that sticks. ethereum gets this right in theory at least
Reply0
SchroedingersFrontrun
· 22h ago
Once the subsidies stop, they run away. I've seen this happen many times... The ones that truly stay are those with strong product strength. Ethereum really has some flavor in this regard.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller
· 22h ago
Once the subsidies stop, people will leave. I'm tired of this old trick. The key is that the product itself must be truly competitive.
Subsidies pump growth, but when the money dries up, so does the user base. Real staying power comes from products that actually deliver—faster speeds, thinner slippage, smoother onboarding, economics that don't screw over creators. On Ethereum, that organic pull hits different: you hold real assets, move them wherever you want, stay sovereign. That's the flywheel that keeps people around.