A high-profile crypto venture collapsed spectacularly in recent weeks. A token that had been promoted through official channels rocketed to a $580 million market capitalization before experiencing a devastating 80% crash. The project's association with a prominent political figure turned heads, and many in the community started drawing parallels to earlier market debacles involving similar hype-driven launches.
The incident underscores a critical lesson: celebrity backing alone doesn't guarantee project legitimacy. When tokens experience such dramatic pump-and-dump patterns—particularly those promoted via official channels—it raises serious red flags about market manipulation and oversight. Investors who chased the initial euphoria faced massive losses, a cautionary tale that's all too familiar in crypto cycles.
This episode highlights why due diligence remains non-negotiable. Tokenomics, development roadmap, community governance, and realistic utility should always outweigh hype narratives. The crypto market has matured enough that blind faith in personalities no longer cuts it. Projects need substantive fundamentals to survive market corrections and maintain credibility.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Rugpull幸存者
· 15h ago
Another celebrity project has collapsed, damn it, it happens every time.
That's why I never follow official channel trends.
Over 500 million in market cap, dropped by 20%... Damn, these people really know how to cut losses.
Political endorsements? Then you'd better run, the tricks are old and obvious.
Doing your homework really saves your life, or you'll be the next one to get harvested.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAO
· 15h ago
It's the same old routine of political figures endorsing, the same script every time. A $580M market cap drops by 80%. Is this what you call a "mature" market? Laughable. Incentive distortion hasn't stopped for a minute.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 15h ago
Is this another celebrity pump? I’ve already said not to chase those influencer coins.
The celebrity effect has been outdated in the crypto world for a long time, and it’s always the same.
5.8 million to a crash… those who follow the trend are the biggest victims.
Tokenomics and fundamentals are the real key, but unfortunately no one pays attention.
That’s why I never touch projects recommended by official sources.
An 80% drop, luckily I got out in time.
Another textbook case of pump and dump.
Compared to that, I still trust on-chain data a bit more.
A high-profile crypto venture collapsed spectacularly in recent weeks. A token that had been promoted through official channels rocketed to a $580 million market capitalization before experiencing a devastating 80% crash. The project's association with a prominent political figure turned heads, and many in the community started drawing parallels to earlier market debacles involving similar hype-driven launches.
The incident underscores a critical lesson: celebrity backing alone doesn't guarantee project legitimacy. When tokens experience such dramatic pump-and-dump patterns—particularly those promoted via official channels—it raises serious red flags about market manipulation and oversight. Investors who chased the initial euphoria faced massive losses, a cautionary tale that's all too familiar in crypto cycles.
This episode highlights why due diligence remains non-negotiable. Tokenomics, development roadmap, community governance, and realistic utility should always outweigh hype narratives. The crypto market has matured enough that blind faith in personalities no longer cuts it. Projects need substantive fundamentals to survive market corrections and maintain credibility.