2026-01-14 19:58:37

The NomNoms points system progress bar has reached 90%. The core logic of this points mechanism is actually quite straightforward—active community members earn skewed rewards through contributions, which sounds pretty good in theory.

But here’s the problem. After the wave of collaborations and sales with Nomunity and MonkeDAO, people in the community quickly noticed an awkward phenomenon: the distribution of NomNoms points is becoming increasingly uneven. Some members receive excessively high incentives, while others get barely anything. This has sparked discussions—Is the current points distribution mechanism truly fair? Can it effectively motivate all contributors?

It seems that NomNoms’ original design was good, but in the actual implementation process, how to ensure that every community participant feels their contributions are being fairly recognized remains a question that needs careful consideration.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryingOldWallet

· 1h ago

It's the same old trick of "theory perfectly practiced and then collapsing," I've seen through it long ago. The huge difference in points is really outrageous; it feels like someone is manipulating behind the scenes. Let's just stop at 90% progress. Instead of rushing, it's better to figure out the allocation mechanism first.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-15 10:32

It's the same old tired distribution logic again, sounds good but reality is nonsense. Naked wealth gap, it's been obvious for a long time. What's the use of a 90% progress bar? The mechanism itself is crippled. After this wave of cooperation, the division has become even more serious, really the end. Feels like we're about to start a tug-of-war again. No matter how beautiful the mechanism is, poor execution can't be supported.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 01-14 20:28

90% progress bar and the like sound great in theory but are actually a trap It's the old trick of uneven distribution, I've seen it all before Feels like these project teams are just good at storytelling, but when it comes to implementation, they fall flat

View OriginalReply0

GweiTooHigh

· 01-14 20:24

It's that old trick of "theory is perfect, actual performance is disappointing" again. Watching 90% progress bars just makes me tired. It seems like NomNoms has just brought wealth disparity onto the chain—some people get the meat, others only get the broth. That's really incredible. Why didn't they test this mechanism properly from the start? Only now are the issues being discovered?

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 01-14 20:12

90% progress bar so fast? It doesn't feel right. If the distribution is so skewed, there will be more trouble ahead. It's the same old story. It seems fair, but secretly someone is taking the big share. That's outrageous. The point system's failure still depends on community feedback; otherwise, it's just paving the red carpet for the whales.

View OriginalReply0

retroactive_airdrop

· 01-14 20:10

It's the same old story, lofty ideals are great but reality is harsh. Quickly change the mechanism, or else it's going to fall apart. I really don't understand such a big gap in points, is this really called motivation? Sounds like an early distribution failed again, classic case.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSauceMaster

· 01-14 20:03

It's that old familiar story of lofty ideals and harsh realities... I don't believe the 90% progress bar; it always feels like it's stuck there. It feels like the early whales have already taken their fill, and now only the leftovers remain. This allocation mechanism is a bit disappointing; is it really fair? I have my doubts. The incentive mechanism has been messed up again; it's the same old trick. So, the key is still how to prevent whales from monopolizing. Clearly, it hasn't been stopped yet.

View OriginalReply0