The airdrop era has come to an end. To be honest, I don't have high expectations for projects that imitate opaque token distribution models—this kind of approach almost signals that the project is likely to suffer losses. We've seen too many cases where, once the project team hides the details of token total supply distribution, the project's prospects are basically already written off. The logic behind this is simple: truly confident projects have long since put the numbers on the table. Those who hide and cover up only make people doubt whether they have even calculated things clearly themselves.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DarkPoolWatcher
· 7h ago
Another project team is playing the "guessing game," they really don't take us seriously
Token distribution is being hidden and obscured, basically saying "I might rug"
Those confident have already gone public, hiding and sneaking around only show one thing
Is this round coming again? I bet five cents this project won't survive the next bear market
Seeing how secretive they are, I knew there must be some tricks
Transparency can be seen at a glance—whether the project team genuinely wants to do something or just wants to harvest the profits
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuck
· 7h ago
Really, I will just pass on projects that hide their tokenomics; there's nothing interesting about that.
Unclear token distribution is basically telling me—either they don't understand it themselves or they haven't thought it through.
Airdrops are dead, but scams are eternal... these projects are still using the old tricks.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 7h ago
Really, I just pass on projects that play token black box games nowadays. I've seen too many of them.
Scam projects love to do this. The lower the transparency, the bigger the risk.
If a project doesn't even dare to disclose the numbers, why should I trust it? That's laughable.
These days, any project with a bit of confidence has already made everything public. Hiding and sneaking around only proves they're hiding something.
View OriginalReply0
StableCoinKaren
· 7h ago
Transparency is really a mirror that reveals all; once covered up, it's an immediate fail.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 7h ago
Transparency should have been a basic operation long ago. Projects that still hide things, I directly pass.
The airdrop era has come to an end. To be honest, I don't have high expectations for projects that imitate opaque token distribution models—this kind of approach almost signals that the project is likely to suffer losses. We've seen too many cases where, once the project team hides the details of token total supply distribution, the project's prospects are basically already written off. The logic behind this is simple: truly confident projects have long since put the numbers on the table. Those who hide and cover up only make people doubt whether they have even calculated things clearly themselves.