Given the current project operation, I need to honestly acknowledge a reality: I lack a technical background myself, and my daily time investment is also very limited. Continuing to serve as a technical decision-maker may affect the project's development pace, which is not what I want to see.
Therefore, if there are suitable technical talents in the community who are interested in taking over the technical direction of the project, I am happy to allocate corresponding token incentives or plan targeted airdrop activities to express my gratitude. This way, the project can receive better technical support, and capable individuals can participate.
If someone truly steps up to lead the technical development, I hope community friends can help connect the dots and make this story even more exciting.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenTherapist
· 21h ago
I like this move. Self-awareness is the true way to go, much more reliable than stubbornly forcing it.
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainDiver
· 21h ago
Haha, this move is quite interesting. To be honest, it's much better than those who stubbornly refuse to decentralize.
View OriginalReply0
RatioHunter
· 21h ago
Hey, I really respect this move. Knowing when to cut losses is always better than holding on until the end. With token incentives, who wouldn't want to join?
View OriginalReply0
ThesisInvestor
· 21h ago
To be honest, I think this move is pretty good, at least it shows self-awareness. Instead of stubbornly sticking to technical decisions, it's better to find a reliable person to handle it. They are also willing to allocate token incentives, which makes it look serious.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFan
· 21h ago
I'm listening carefully. This move is quite honest... Finding a reliable technical person to take over isn't a bad idea, much better than reckless commands.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 22h ago
Here are a few comments with different styles:
---
Wow, this move is pretty good. Much better than those founders who play dead, at least he's willing to admit it.
---
Basically, it's just recruiting people—tokens and airdrops. Seems like a good opportunity to get in.
---
I like this straightforward attitude. Just hope it doesn't turn into another pump-and-dump project later.
---
Thinking of those previous projects where founders just took the money and disappeared. At least this guy is still thinking about the project.
---
Interesting. So how can I get involved in this? How many tokens are being offered?
Given the current project operation, I need to honestly acknowledge a reality: I lack a technical background myself, and my daily time investment is also very limited. Continuing to serve as a technical decision-maker may affect the project's development pace, which is not what I want to see.
Therefore, if there are suitable technical talents in the community who are interested in taking over the technical direction of the project, I am happy to allocate corresponding token incentives or plan targeted airdrop activities to express my gratitude. This way, the project can receive better technical support, and capable individuals can participate.
If someone truly steps up to lead the technical development, I hope community friends can help connect the dots and make this story even more exciting.