In the highly competitive RWA (Real World Assets) track this year, some projects are beginning to explore a differentiated approach called "compliant privacy." Unlike most privacy-focused public blockchains that pursue complete anonymity, some teams are considering how to protect user privacy while meeting global audit requirements. Finding this balance is actually quite challenging.
**Innovative Directions in Technical Foundations**
Core competitiveness is reflected in the design of the virtual machine. Many projects use a general-purpose EVM, but Piecrust virtual machine takes a different path—optimized at the instruction level for zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP). The benefits of this approach are obvious: faster processing of complex compliance logic and reduced Gas consumption.
Through the Zedger protocol mechanism, this type of solution achieves an interesting balance: asset ownership can be privacy-preserving, yet the audit trail remains fully traceable. In other words, institutions can perform KYC/AML audits with a single click while protecting customer trade secrets. This provides a practical solution to the compliance bottleneck for on-chain financial assets.
**Implementation Ideas for Financial Applications**
The most exciting aspect is the design of identity protocols. Users can generate a "privacy pass" to complete interaction verification without revealing underlying identity information. This is not just a concept but a real-world demonstration in actual activities, showing the potential for transitioning from theory to application.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-26d7f434
· 9h ago
The compliance and privacy aspect is indeed interesting, but can Piecrust's virtual machine optimization really beat EVM? It seems we still have to wait for the launch data to speak.
View OriginalReply0
ContractBugHunter
· 20h ago
Can privacy and compliance really go hand in hand? It sounds pretty uncertain. Let's see how it works once it's actually up and running.
View OriginalReply0
rug_connoisseur
· 20h ago
Compliance and privacy are truly areas with potential for imagination, but it also feels like walking a tightrope.
Privacy chains have been developed for so many years, but only a few are truly practical.
This方案 sounds good, let's see if it can withstand scrutiny later.
Piecrust's virtual machine optimization sounds quite solid; no one would oppose reducing gas fees.
One-click audit approval? Let's wait and see real cases first.
I'm curious to see the demonstration process of this "Privacy Pass."
Compliance and privacy are inherently conflicting; even if the balance is well struck, it must stand the test.
Machine-readable audit chains sound easy to say, but where will the actual implementation get stuck?
Institutional-level demands are indeed significant, but I'm worried it might just turn into another story of cutting the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 20h ago
The path of compliance and privacy has indeed become competitive, but Piecrust's ZKP optimization still seems to have some potential.
View OriginalReply0
LostBetweenChains
· 20h ago
Compliance and privacy are indeed bottlenecks. I think the Piecrust approach looks promising, and the instruction-level optimization of ZKP is not something to be taken lightly. However, can Zedger really pass the review with one click? It feels like there's still a gap between the theoretical concept and the actual implementation.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 21h ago
Compliance and privacy are indeed competitive areas, but it seems most projects are still just talking on paper.
Privacy passports sound good, but I'm worried they might just be a PPT dream.
Piecrust's ZKP optimization方案 does have some substance, but how many can truly be implemented?
Wait, can this mechanism really withstand regulation from various countries? That's uncertain.
Audits are traceable, but asset privacy sounds a bit contradictory... How to ensure no loopholes?
In the highly competitive RWA (Real World Assets) track this year, some projects are beginning to explore a differentiated approach called "compliant privacy." Unlike most privacy-focused public blockchains that pursue complete anonymity, some teams are considering how to protect user privacy while meeting global audit requirements. Finding this balance is actually quite challenging.
**Innovative Directions in Technical Foundations**
Core competitiveness is reflected in the design of the virtual machine. Many projects use a general-purpose EVM, but Piecrust virtual machine takes a different path—optimized at the instruction level for zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP). The benefits of this approach are obvious: faster processing of complex compliance logic and reduced Gas consumption.
Through the Zedger protocol mechanism, this type of solution achieves an interesting balance: asset ownership can be privacy-preserving, yet the audit trail remains fully traceable. In other words, institutions can perform KYC/AML audits with a single click while protecting customer trade secrets. This provides a practical solution to the compliance bottleneck for on-chain financial assets.
**Implementation Ideas for Financial Applications**
The most exciting aspect is the design of identity protocols. Users can generate a "privacy pass" to complete interaction verification without revealing underlying identity information. This is not just a concept but a real-world demonstration in actual activities, showing the potential for transitioning from theory to application.