The judicial process rarely moves at the pace markets demand.
Take the tariff dispute as an example. Legally speaking, a decision doesn't need to come tomorrow—or next month. Cases can stretch through the entire session and beyond, with policies staying active all the while.
Here's the tension: traders crave certainty and quick resolutions. They want black and white. But courts operate differently. The timeline depends on procedure, briefs, deliberation—not on how urgently the market is waiting.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The judicial process rarely moves at the pace markets demand.
Take the tariff dispute as an example. Legally speaking, a decision doesn't need to come tomorrow—or next month. Cases can stretch through the entire session and beyond, with policies staying active all the while.
Here's the tension: traders crave certainty and quick resolutions. They want black and white. But courts operate differently. The timeline depends on procedure, briefs, deliberation—not on how urgently the market is waiting.