The most ironic thing in Web3? After a year of intensive interaction, the airdrops received are still fewer than what 1,000 bot accounts can get. This "headcount distribution" model has completely failed.



The real problem is: on-chain activity can't distinguish between genuine users and scripts that spam data. Mass mechanical interactions drown out those who truly contribute, which is a classic case of bad money driving out good.

Some projects are starting to address this issue from a different angle—by introducing AI-driven value assessment systems. The core idea is straightforward: separate "surface interactions" from "actual contributions." With smarter recognition mechanisms, they filter out hollow on-chain operations, allowing users who create real value to stand out.

This approach is worth paying attention to. Anti-witching mechanisms combined with contribution quantification might be the future direction for airdrop distribution.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)