Among numerous blockchain projects, the depth of background resources often determines the project's development potential. Projects with strong resources in hand are more adept in ecosystem construction, compliance promotion, and market expansion. They can connect more quickly, gain policy friendliness, and are more likely to attract institutional attention and user trust. In contrast, resource-constrained teams, although technically proficient, often struggle during implementation and promotion phases. This is why some projects can grow steadily while others fall behind in competition.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaEggplant
· 20h ago
Basically, it's about having money and connections to get things done. No matter how advanced the technology is, without resources, it's useless.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 20h ago
Basically, it's about relying on connections. Even with good skills, you need to have the right contacts.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologist
· 20h ago
Basically, it's all about who your parents are. No matter how skilled you are technically, without connections, it's useless.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSauceMaster
· 20h ago
Basically, it's about who your parents are. No matter how awesome your skills are, without a background, it's still useless.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobber
· 20h ago
Basically, children with a powerful backer can enjoy the shade, while those without a background are doomed no matter how talented they are.
Among numerous blockchain projects, the depth of background resources often determines the project's development potential. Projects with strong resources in hand are more adept in ecosystem construction, compliance promotion, and market expansion. They can connect more quickly, gain policy friendliness, and are more likely to attract institutional attention and user trust. In contrast, resource-constrained teams, although technically proficient, often struggle during implementation and promotion phases. This is why some projects can grow steadily while others fall behind in competition.