Many people seem to be thriving, but it's mostly due to the media's amplified benefits. You see them speaking confidently on various professional topics, but essentially it's just marketing tactics—building a persona through popularity and exposure.
What truly warrants caution is that some people treat the media as their main career from the very beginning. They lack genuine career accumulation and instead create a false success story through public opinion manipulation. In such cases, either this "achievement" doesn't belong to them at all, or it's entirely fictitious. Those who have real output first and then use the media to amplify are the ones worth paying attention to.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BakedCatFanboy
· 17h ago
To put it simply, these days the screen is full of "persona," how many of them are truly genuine? Relying solely on media hype, even the most capable person can be turned into a legend.
Real capable people are busy working behind the scenes; they have no time to promote themselves every day.
This wave is indeed hard to distinguish; in the era of traffic, no one cares about your foundation.
Wait, why don't those who are trending on hot searches every day show some real skills?
View OriginalReply0
MrRightClick
· 17h ago
Some people really survive on hype, with no real skills or knowledge at all.
The media amplifies this, and I'm almost numb to it—masters at making up stories.
These days, it's hard to tell who's truly impressive and who's just bluffing.
Speak only when you have results; otherwise, you're just talking nonsense.
It seems that nine and a half out of ten so-called experts are just marketing tricks; without the hype, they're nothing.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainSleuth
· 17h ago
You are absolutely right. Over the past few years, it's been all about pure tactics. Some influencers just rely on reposts and comments to boost their popularity, with no real skills or knowledge.
I've seen through it long ago; only with actual output can one have the right to speak, otherwise it's just storytelling.
The most annoying thing in the Web3 circle is this kind of behavior—riding hot topics and pretending to understand. When asked about details, they get exposed.
Honestly, those who work quietly often go unnoticed, while the media loves to chase those who create buzz.
In the end, it's still about information asymmetry—retail investors are fooled, while those with real output remain silent.
Many people seem to be thriving, but it's mostly due to the media's amplified benefits. You see them speaking confidently on various professional topics, but essentially it's just marketing tactics—building a persona through popularity and exposure.
What truly warrants caution is that some people treat the media as their main career from the very beginning. They lack genuine career accumulation and instead create a false success story through public opinion manipulation. In such cases, either this "achievement" doesn't belong to them at all, or it's entirely fictitious. Those who have real output first and then use the media to amplify are the ones worth paying attention to.