2026-01-14 18:37:05

Stop falling for hollow trophy programs. What if awards actually meant something?

Transparent judging criteria, blockchain-verified winners, and real community consensus—these aren't buzzwords, they're the foundation for awards that build genuine credibility. When startups can prove legitimacy through immutable records rather than hype cycles, the game changes fast.

For emerging projects, this shift is huge: faster trust-building, clearer market differentiation, and an on-chain track record that speaks louder than any marketing claim.

So here's the real question—do awards influence your investment or partnership decisions? And more importantly, would you trust an award more if it came with blockchain verification backing it up?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DefiOldTrickster

· 6h ago

Bro, the on-chain verification rewards? I've been playing this since 2017, and I still got caught off guard. But to be fair, this time it seems to be a bit different...

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 6h ago

On-chain verification is truly effective and much more reliable than those trophies bought with money.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_wallet

· 6h ago

ngl on-chain verification sounds good, but it still depends on whether the issuer is trustworthy.

View OriginalReply0

SerRugResistant

· 6h ago

To be honest, the current awards are just a joke, all bought with money. On-chain verification really has some substance, at least the transparency is there.

View OriginalReply0