Seeing a major crypto fund acquire a project that's widely viewed as problematic in the community definitely raises eyebrows. Beyond the controversial reception, what's truly puzzling is the valuation logic here. You're looking at a deal where negative sentiment outweighs any clear asset value—investors are essentially trying to find worth in something the market has largely rejected. The real question becomes: on what basis do you even justify the price tag? When community trust is essentially negative, and you're struggling to identify tangible fundamentals, you're essentially betting on a complete narrative turnaround or dormant adoption potential that most builders have already written off. It's a bold—or perhaps baffling—move that challenges conventional investment thesis in crypto.