Back in 2019, a financial analyst highlighted that Iran's government had secured control of roughly 70% of the banking sector. When Ayandeh Bank subsequently collapsed, it exposed a harsh reality—the entire banking infrastructure was far more fragile than many assumed. The failure sent shockwaves through markets, crystallizing concerns that if systemic problems emerge, everyday citizens and public budgets inevitably bear the burden. It's a stark reminder of how interconnected financial fragility can be, with ripple effects that extend well beyond institutional walls.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeLovervip
· 20h ago
When Iran's banking system collapses, ordinary people are the ones who get blamed... This trick is the same worldwide.
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperervip
· 20h ago
The banking system is so fragile, how can ordinary people survive...
View OriginalReply0
MetaRecktvip
· 20h ago
When a bank collapses, the common people pay the price. This trick is universally used worldwide.
View OriginalReply0
ChainComedianvip
· 20h ago
70% control can still lead to a collapse, this is called a fragile big holder...
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 20h ago
70% concentration... It is worth noting that this governance structure has already met all the trigger conditions for systemic risk, a result that can be fully predicted based on white paper-level financial vulnerability theory.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)