2026-01-14 18:25:30

The crypto market has been debating whether "compliance will stifle innovation," but the collaboration between DUSK and the Dutch licensed exchange NPEX has already answered this question with concrete actions. This is not just a hype-driven partnership, but a real-world practice of financial onboarding on the blockchain.

What is NPEX? As a regulated Dutch exchange, it mainly avoids high-frequency speculation and focuses on serving small and medium-sized enterprises for financing, securities issuance, and trading. These types of institutions have a completely different imagination for blockchain—they require efficiency but cannot have information flooding the entire network, and must stay within regulatory boundaries. Most public chains are reluctant to touch this gray area. DUSK, however, has set its sights on it.

Technology is not just talk. DUSK, based on zero-knowledge proofs and privacy computing, can achieve "data concealment and verifiable results" on-chain. For licensed institutions like NPEX, corporate financing data, investor information, and transaction details do not need to be exposed to the entire network, yet compliance, legality, and asset authenticity can still be verified. This perfectly bridges the gap between traditional finance and blockchain.

More importantly, this collaboration sends a signal: DUSK is not just imagining a future compliant environment, but actively using technology to adapt to the existing financial order. This approach is worth referencing for other public chains.

DUSK-2,71%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SnapshotStriker

· 9h ago

Sigh, can compliance really kill innovation? DUSK proves it with facts, zero-knowledge proofs are working well. --- Privacy + compliance, how come other public chains haven't thought of this... --- Real action definitely beats empty slogans, but can NPEX at this scale support the market? --- Data hiding results are verifiable, sounds very appealing, but I'm just worried it might end up as a dead end... --- Adapting to financial order rather than fighting against it, this approach is indeed a bit different. --- Zero-knowledge proofs are useful, but the ecosystem isn't mature enough yet. We'll have to see the implementation results later. --- DUSK definitely made the right bet this time; there's a huge gap between traditional finance and blockchain. --- Institutional finance + privacy computing, seems promising, just don't know when it will truly explode. --- Other public chains are still hyping concepts, while they are actually doing real work... --- Sounds good, but in the end, it all depends on whose technology is truly solid.

View OriginalReply0

quietly_staking

· 01-14 18:55

This is the right way, there's no need to go against regulation.

View OriginalReply0

HalfBuddhaMoney

· 01-14 18:55

Really, DUSK's recent moves are the right way to go—no following the trend, no reckless hype, just doing real work. --- Zero-knowledge proofs are truly excellent; they can balance privacy and compliance. Now traditional finance has no reason to refuse. --- Other public chains are still arguing about whether to accept regulation, while DUSK is already making money. --- Finding opportunities in the gray area—that's product thinking, not just a tech show. --- NPEX is backed by Dutch regulators, and this partnership is much more reliable than those airy projects' collaborations. --- To put it simply, it's not that compliance stifles innovation; most teams just don't want to solve real problems. --- Results of data hiding can be verified. I need to study this scheme; it feels like there's something there. --- Seamless integration between traditional finance and on-chain implementation—that's what Web3 should be doing. --- Laughing out loud, still arguing about compliance, while DUSK already treats it as a product advantage. --- This time, it's really not marketing hype; there seems to be real business backing with solid cash flow.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeNFTrader

· 01-14 18:54

Finally, someone is not just talking but taking action. DUSK's move is quite aggressive, and zero-knowledge proofs are really being put to use. DUSK's approach makes sense. Instead of constantly boasting about compliance, it's better to directly provide what financial institutions want: privacy + verifiability. The work in the middle is the hardest. Honestly, most public chains just don't want to put in the effort, but DUSK dares to venture into the gray area. That's true innovation. I've been paying attention to zero-knowledge proof technology for a long time, and it's finally seeing practical implementation. However, how far it can go still depends on the data volume on the NPEX side. If this collaboration really succeeds, will other licensed institutions follow suit? It's hard to say in the short term.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-7b078580

· 01-14 18:52

But still, can zero-knowledge proofs really be implemented? Hourly statistics often prove unreliable.

View OriginalReply0

HorizonHunter

· 01-14 18:48

Finally, someone is no longer just talking empty words. DUSK's move is indeed clever—able to go on-chain without provoking regulatory backlash. This is the true way to survive. Compliance is not the enemy of innovation; it's naive to think so. Technology must learn to compromise. Zero-knowledge proofs are used in the right context—combining data privacy with on-chain verifiability. The traditional finance crowd can finally understand blockchain. Speaking of which, institutions like NPEX should have embraced on-chain integration long ago. Efficiency can be doubled, and DUSK has found the right entry point. No hype, no hype—DUSK's recent moves have definitely slapped those public chains that only shout "revolution" in the face. Everyone fears the gray areas, but the money is there. With solid technology, they will eventually step in. That's what DUSK is thinking. Real-world compliant blockchains are much more reliable than those PPT projects. Finally, we're seeing some real substance.

View OriginalReply0