Privacy public chains are often misunderstood. Many people in the market equate privacy with complete anonymity, but what financial institutions actually need is not that. They truly care about protecting their business secrets within a compliant framework—such as holdings data, transaction volumes, order intentions, and information related to counterparty risk exposure.
In the past six months of iterations, Dusk has increasingly clarified this distinction. Through the Hedger engine, combined with the integration solutions of Chainlink and NPEX, privacy has evolved from a purely theoretical concept into a product module that financial institutions can actually procure. In other words, Dusk's competitiveness is shifting from cryptographic theoretical research toward a product-oriented approach that can be practically adopted by institutions. This transformation means that DUSK, as the ecosystem's fuel token, will enjoy more stable and sustained demand support.
Let's look at the design logic of Hedger. It is not an independent privacy chain nor an external privacy module, but rather the privacy engine built into DuskEVM itself. The key innovation lies in combining homomorphic encryption with zero-knowledge proofs, while also adopting a hybrid scheme of UTXO and account models. This ensures a smooth EVM development experience while meeting regulatory and audit compliance requirements.
Currently, many privacy solutions on the market focus solely on zero-knowledge proofs. However, when developing financial applications, relying solely on zero-knowledge proofs can easily hit performance and system complexity ceilings. Hedger's advantage is using homomorphic encryption to handle encrypted numerical computations, then employing zero-knowledge proofs to verify the correctness of these calculations. This "division of labor" makes privacy transactions more scalable by default, rather than requiring additional processing each time.
Another particularly important point is that it incorporates auditability as an intrinsic feature, rather than an afterthought. This represents a significant improvement in financial compliance, opening up a new dimension of capability.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedThrice
· 5h ago
Finally, someone has clarified it. The concept of privacy ≠ anonymity has been misunderstood countless times.
Hedger's design is indeed excellent. The idea of combining homomorphic encryption with zero-knowledge proofs for a "division of labor" is much smarter than simply stacking zk proofs, and it directly breaks through the performance ceiling.
Institutional finance needs this kind of auditable privacy, not the hide-and-seek approach used in the crypto circle. Dusk has truly found the product-market fit with this wave.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckbox
· 11h ago
Finally, someone has clarified the issue of privacy—it's not something everyone wants to hide and seek about.
---
Hedger's set of combined strategies indeed has some substance; homomorphic encryption paired with zero-knowledge proofs is not just a simple 1+1.
---
To put it simply, what institutions want is to protect trade secrets within a compliant framework. Dusk has caught the pain point this time.
---
I think the key lies in the endogenous audit attribute; it's much smarter than only thinking about adding it after the fact.
---
Wait, can the UTXO mixed account model really run smoothly? It seems easy to run into pitfalls.
---
Privacy ≠ anonymity; these concepts are vastly different. The market has indeed misunderstood, and I see Dusk's narrative shift.
---
It feels like Hedger is working on productizing privacy, from theoretical implementation to real-world cash—this step is crucial.
---
The issue of performance ceiling definitely exists; let's see how Dusk handles it. Can't just boast about theory.
---
Will the stable demand support for the fuel token hold? That depends on whether institutions will actually make purchases.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 11h ago
Yes, this is pragmatic. Finally, someone has revealed the truth about privacy chains.
Privacy ≠ anonymity. Too many people misunderstand this. Institutions want to protect trade secrets within compliance.
The Hedger design is indeed interesting, combining homomorphic encryption with zero-knowledge proofs. They've found a breakthrough for the performance ceiling issue.
Auditing should be intrinsic rather than remedial afterward. This move is powerful, directly addressing the pain points of financial compliance.
DUSK is transitioning from theory to productization, and you can truly see their sincerity.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHugger
· 11h ago
Finally, someone has explained it thoroughly: privacy ≠ anonymity. This point needs to be emphasized repeatedly.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTeller
· 11h ago
To be honest, this is what I want to hear. The whole anonymous coin approach has long been outdated; institutions want that feeling of "I have privacy, but I can prove I'm compliant." Dusk's approach really hits the mark.
Privacy public chains are often misunderstood. Many people in the market equate privacy with complete anonymity, but what financial institutions actually need is not that. They truly care about protecting their business secrets within a compliant framework—such as holdings data, transaction volumes, order intentions, and information related to counterparty risk exposure.
In the past six months of iterations, Dusk has increasingly clarified this distinction. Through the Hedger engine, combined with the integration solutions of Chainlink and NPEX, privacy has evolved from a purely theoretical concept into a product module that financial institutions can actually procure. In other words, Dusk's competitiveness is shifting from cryptographic theoretical research toward a product-oriented approach that can be practically adopted by institutions. This transformation means that DUSK, as the ecosystem's fuel token, will enjoy more stable and sustained demand support.
Let's look at the design logic of Hedger. It is not an independent privacy chain nor an external privacy module, but rather the privacy engine built into DuskEVM itself. The key innovation lies in combining homomorphic encryption with zero-knowledge proofs, while also adopting a hybrid scheme of UTXO and account models. This ensures a smooth EVM development experience while meeting regulatory and audit compliance requirements.
Currently, many privacy solutions on the market focus solely on zero-knowledge proofs. However, when developing financial applications, relying solely on zero-knowledge proofs can easily hit performance and system complexity ceilings. Hedger's advantage is using homomorphic encryption to handle encrypted numerical computations, then employing zero-knowledge proofs to verify the correctness of these calculations. This "division of labor" makes privacy transactions more scalable by default, rather than requiring additional processing each time.
Another particularly important point is that it incorporates auditability as an intrinsic feature, rather than an afterthought. This represents a significant improvement in financial compliance, opening up a new dimension of capability.