2026-01-14 17:22:42

The list of the first batch of core contributors for the Sentient AGI community has been officially announced. From over 2000 applications, 10 individuals were selected, including three active members of the Chinese community. Congratulations to them.

This monthly selection program is called "Sentient Sparks." Core contributors who are selected will enjoy early access to new products, ecosystem incentives, and direct support from the core team.

It's not difficult to join. Refer to the contribution methods of those who have been selected—whether it’s content creation, community operation, or ecosystem development—any activity that brings real value to the project community could lead to recognition in the next round. Interested friends are encouraged to actively participate in community building. We look forward to seeing more outstanding contributors join.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

UnluckyValidator

· 1h ago

Damn, over 2000 applications and only 10 selected. The competition is a bit outrageous. --- The Chinese community was also selected for three spots. It feels like this round of the Sparks program is quite serious. --- Early access rights + ecosystem incentives. Basically, it's a great opportunity to get some free benefits. --- Is there a chance to participate? Then I’d better quickly think about how to contribute in a way that looks decent. --- Out of over 2000, only 10 spots. The lucky guys who got in are really fortunate. --- I like this kind of monthly selection. It’s much more reliable than projects that just randomly distribute tokens. --- Building a community seriously isn’t that hard; the key is to find the right entry point. --- Only 10 spots, and no idea when the next round will be. I need to act fast. --- Supporting directly is the most attractive part. You can get close contact with the core team.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoNomics

· 11h ago

actually, if you run a basic statistical analysis on their selection criteria, the 0.5% acceptance rate screams potential selection bias. where's the empirical evidence for "actual value"? sounds like tokenomics theater to me.

Reply0

RektCoaster

· 01-14 17:52

Ha, over 2000 applications and only 10 selected, the acceptance rate is indeed a bit harsh. --- The brothers in the Chinese community have produced three more, it seems someone is really serious about making things happen. --- In the early experience rights and ecosystem incentives, how much real skill is needed to get through? --- Basically, it’s about getting the work done, no real tricks involved. --- Feels like another new scheme to cut leeks? Or is there really something there? --- Forget it, let’s just observe how these ten guys perform first. --- But on the other hand, truly valuable contributors are indeed scarce. --- Is there a chance in the next round? Then let’s go for it, anyway, it’s not a loss.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeGazer

· 01-14 17:48

Damn, over 2,000 people competing for ten spots, the acceptance rate is insane. --- Three spots selected from the Chinese community, so I need to work harder and aim to get in next round. --- Early access rights + ecosystem incentives, this combo is still attractive, I should seriously consider participating. --- Honestly, just producing content isn't enough, I feel like luck also plays a role. --- Sentient Sparks is a pretty good name, it sounds very promising. --- How did those guys who got selected do it? Can I learn from their approach? --- Another screening mechanism like this, I feel like someone on the fringe like me might be a bit risky. --- But on the other hand, having direct support is worth trying, since the community is going to play anyway.

View OriginalReply0

MissedAirdropAgain

· 01-14 17:46

Oh no, I see someone else made the list again. Why didn't I get selected this time? But honestly, the selection criteria are pretty interesting; you have to rely on actual contributions.

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinTherapist