When someone decides to launch a fresh token, it's worth asking: what could possibly go sideways? Market timing, liquidity depth, holder sentiment, tokenomics mechanics—there are plenty of moving parts that can catch projects off guard. The real question isn't whether risks exist, but whether the fundamentals are solid enough to weather them.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
bridgeOops
· 2h ago
Nah, these new coins are mostly gambling, and there are only a few that can really hold up.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 2h ago
ngl, it's another bunch of "fundamentals" talk, but 90% of new coins launching haven't even thought about these things.
View OriginalReply0
Frontrunner
· 2h ago
ngl Most new coin issuers haven't thought about these issues at all; they just rush forward blindly...
View OriginalReply0
Rekt_Recovery
· 3h ago
ngl, i've seen this movie too many times. liquidity dries up faster than my portfolio after a 50x leverage play, and suddenly "solid fundamentals" don't mean shit when the whales start dumping. been there, survived that.
When someone decides to launch a fresh token, it's worth asking: what could possibly go sideways? Market timing, liquidity depth, holder sentiment, tokenomics mechanics—there are plenty of moving parts that can catch projects off guard. The real question isn't whether risks exist, but whether the fundamentals are solid enough to weather them.