2026-01-14 14:00:56

Position management, to be honest, there is no universal formula. You need to determine it based on your own capital size, risk tolerance, and trading rhythm—if managed properly, losses during market downturns can be controlled, and you can also benefit from upward trends; if not, you might either be too conservative and miss opportunities or be overly aggressive and increase losses.

Every trader is exploring their own rhythm between "aggressive" and "conservative." This process has no shortcuts; it usually takes one or two years of practical experience to gradually find the right feel.

**The reality is harsh, but these data are very real.**

No one can guarantee 100% profitable trading, but from long-term trading records, risk can be quantified and controlled:

• An account with 300,000 in capital can keep loss risks within 10%—this is already a relatively low risk level.

• An account with 500,000 in capital has a larger tolerance for strategy errors, with loss probability reduced to about 1%.

• When capital exceeds 1 million, through detailed position allocation and batch strategies, the likelihood of loss is basically close to zero.

This is not a conclusion drawn from guesswork but a pattern summarized from actual trading data. The underlying logic is simple:

**First**, thorough communication is key. Treat each fund as if it were your own money—discuss strategies together, maintain stable position control, avoid greed and impatience, and use time to exchange for returns.

**Second**, the strategy itself must stand the test. The long-term accuracy rate of trading decisions remains stable at 85%-90%, which is achieved through countless practical experiences.

**Third**, being caught in a position is a common issue. The key is whether there is a complete response plan and whether you can quickly adjust your mindset.

**Fourth**, every operational suggestion must not be taken lightly. Trading signals issued must be verified repeatedly because, for the trader’s account safety, they carry direct responsibility.

Ultimately, excellent position management is about maintaining composure and control amid market fluctuations. This is especially true in trading mainstream assets like #美国就业数据不及预期 and $BTC . Understanding your risk threshold is the secret to long-term survival.

BTC1,3%

ETH-0,31%

ZEC4,35%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DAOdreamer

· 17h ago

That makes sense, but I think an accuracy rate of 85-90% is a bit optimistic. Real trading isn't that stable...

View OriginalReply0

Ser_This_Is_A_Casino

· 17h ago

It's still somewhat idealistic; where in real trading do you find such perfect data? --- I just want to ask, why haven't traders with an 85% accuracy rate made any money? --- The more capital you have, the closer the probability of loss approaches zero—doesn't this logic seem backwards? Larger funds are more likely to cause a blowout. --- Position management definitely needs to be learned on your own, but honestly, most people remain clueless after a year or two. --- Is there a strategy for dealing with being caught in a position? It's either holding on stubbornly or cutting losses—there's no third option. --- Sounds like you're advertising some consulting service; I'm a bit wary. --- Tired of hearing that you can exchange time for returns; in a bear market, even time can't save you.

View OriginalReply0

HackerWhoCares

· 17h ago

Selling plans again, can you really show a delivery slip for us to see?

View OriginalReply0

DataPickledFish

· 17h ago

Really, you're right. But honestly, most people can't hold on for a year or two before they run away. --- Is 1 million enough to approach zero risk? Then my 300,000 will have to worry until the Year of the Monkey. --- An accuracy rate of 85 to 90, that data sounds pretty uncertain. Can real trading really be that stable? --- I'm most worried about not having a plan when caught in a trap, panicking is the biggest problem. --- So, is the core of position management still mindset? Feels like after all this talk, that's still the main point. --- When US employment data is released, I immediately close all positions, regardless of whether it's aggressive or conservative. --- Using time to exchange for returns sounds comfortable, but when the account is falling, it really tests your psychology. --- The recent trend of BTC clearly shows who manages their positions well and who doesn't.

View OriginalReply0

WenAirdrop

· 17h ago

You are right, but the real challenge is persistence. Most people fail due to their mindset. --- Is 1 million enough to approach zero risk? Then my 300,000 account is basically walking a tightrope every day. --- Forget about 85%-90% accuracy rates; the market isn't a machine, everyone has their bad days. --- Position management is easy to say but hard to do; it depends on whether you can find a balance between greed and fear. --- When employment data unexpectedly drops, it's actually a test of your mindset. Most people can't hold on. --- Five years of trading experience tell me that those who control risk the best tend to earn steadily. There's no doubt about that. --- Instead of researching strategies, it's better to ask yourself how much you can lose. That's the fundamental question. --- Complete plan for being caught in a trap? I bet most will just tough it out, and that can last three months. --- The larger the capital, the greater the tolerance for errors. This logic is reversed; psychological pressure increases with size, making mistakes more likely. --- It takes one or two years of practical experience to develop a feel; I think most people give up after one or two years.

View OriginalReply0