The crypto community spent nearly 11 months debating a critical question: would testnet participants get shorted on airdrops while projects favored Binance Alpha users and high-frequency posters? Monad answered the dilemma in just two weeks with a different approach. Instead of following the conventional playbook, the protocol demonstrated that testnet contributors could receive meaningful allocation without sacrificing fairness or diluting rewards for other stakeholders. It's a practical case study in how projects can sidestep months of community friction through decisive mechanism design.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektRecovery
· 9h ago
honestly monad just speedrunned what should've taken the committee 6 months to argue about... mechanism design ain't rocket science but somehow 99% of projects treat airdrops like a political football. predictable vulnerability? nah, this time they actually thought it through
Reply0
SignatureAnxiety
· 9h ago
This time Monad finally got it right. What took two weeks to complete has caused the entire community to bicker for 11 months. It's a bit ironic.
View OriginalReply0
PumpStrategist
· 9h ago
Haha, finally a project that doesn't follow the usual pattern. The chip distribution is so transparent that it makes the previous 11 months of bickering by other projects look so ridiculous [laugh]
View OriginalReply0
CryingOldWallet
· 9h ago
monad is really smart this time, not messing around with those fancy but empty things
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobber
· 9h ago
Monad's move this time is a textbook-level operation, finally a project daring to break the old airdrop script.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 9h ago
Really? Solved in just two weeks? Much better than those who argue every day haha
The crypto community spent nearly 11 months debating a critical question: would testnet participants get shorted on airdrops while projects favored Binance Alpha users and high-frequency posters? Monad answered the dilemma in just two weeks with a different approach. Instead of following the conventional playbook, the protocol demonstrated that testnet contributors could receive meaningful allocation without sacrificing fairness or diluting rewards for other stakeholders. It's a practical case study in how projects can sidestep months of community friction through decisive mechanism design.