Recently, DeFi has seen new developments. A leading DEX burned 16,000 UNI tokens within 24 hours, and this is not a fleeting trend; it is supported by a comprehensive mechanism.
First, let's understand the background of this event. UNI is the governance token of a certain DEX, with a fixed total supply of 1 billion tokens. Since its launch in 2020, the ecosystem has been driven by community co-governance. Some may think that burning 16,000 tokens is insignificant, but once you understand the underlying logic, you'll realize what it truly represents.
By the end of 2025, the community approved a new mechanism called "Fee Switch + Linkage Burn." In simple terms, the platform allocates a portion of each transaction fee to buy back and burn UNI tokens. This creates a continuous deflationary cycle—larger trading volumes lead to more significant burns. This is not just a marketing gimmick; it is real token contraction with tangible funds.
Let's also consider the significance of the data comparison. On-chain information is everywhere—today, reports say large holders are selling, tomorrow, unlocking pressure is coming—but the real actions of the project team tell the true story—they use actual funds to perform counter-operations. Looking at the scale of this burn compared to previous burns in December, what does it indicate? It suggests that trading activity is supporting the burn volume, and the token supply is being compressed.
Looking ahead, this deflationary mechanism will have a long-term impact. As long as trading remains active, burns will continue unabated. This will have a sustained effect on UNI's circulating supply structure, and the impact is verifiable and non-reversible.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Degentleman
· 8h ago
Basically, it's real money being spent, not just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 8h ago
Really? Finally, there's a project that's truly happening, not just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller69
· 8h ago
To be honest, this mechanism does seem to have some substance, but I still need to wait and see if trading volume can really support it.
That being said, deflation expectations are back. Will this turn out to be just hype again?
View OriginalReply0
JustHodlIt
· 8h ago
Real money being burned/destroyed, nothing to say about it.
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 8h ago
This deflation mechanism really looks reliable, with the logic of transactions being burned in a closed loop.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossiper
· 8h ago
Wow, this is true tokenomics, not some armchair theorizing.
Recently, DeFi has seen new developments. A leading DEX burned 16,000 UNI tokens within 24 hours, and this is not a fleeting trend; it is supported by a comprehensive mechanism.
First, let's understand the background of this event. UNI is the governance token of a certain DEX, with a fixed total supply of 1 billion tokens. Since its launch in 2020, the ecosystem has been driven by community co-governance. Some may think that burning 16,000 tokens is insignificant, but once you understand the underlying logic, you'll realize what it truly represents.
By the end of 2025, the community approved a new mechanism called "Fee Switch + Linkage Burn." In simple terms, the platform allocates a portion of each transaction fee to buy back and burn UNI tokens. This creates a continuous deflationary cycle—larger trading volumes lead to more significant burns. This is not just a marketing gimmick; it is real token contraction with tangible funds.
Let's also consider the significance of the data comparison. On-chain information is everywhere—today, reports say large holders are selling, tomorrow, unlocking pressure is coming—but the real actions of the project team tell the true story—they use actual funds to perform counter-operations. Looking at the scale of this burn compared to previous burns in December, what does it indicate? It suggests that trading activity is supporting the burn volume, and the token supply is being compressed.
Looking ahead, this deflationary mechanism will have a long-term impact. As long as trading remains active, burns will continue unabated. This will have a sustained effect on UNI's circulating supply structure, and the impact is verifiable and non-reversible.