2026-01-14 11:35:35

Sei's growth model is quite interesting. Many public blockchains rely on a popular project to drive the entire ecosystem, but Sei takes a different approach — it simultaneously advances in DeFi, payments, gaming, and consumer applications. Traffic gradually accumulates through multi-dimensional stacking, and then these applications begin to drive traffic to each other. This ecosystem complementarity is indeed more stable than relying on a single point.

Interestingly, within this multi-layered traffic system, the role of Kindred AI is quite special. It is not just a simple application provider but occupies a unique position in the ecosystem, capable of connecting the needs of multiple scenarios. The advantage of this deep layout is precisely the sign of Sei's ecosystem gradually maturing.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropATM

· 9h ago

Multiple tracks taking off simultaneously sounds good, but can they really drive traffic to each other? It still depends on what happens next.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightGenesis

· 9h ago

On-chain data shows that Sei's multi-dimensional traffic accumulation logic is indeed interesting. However, for the Kindred AI part, I need to review the specific timeline of contract deployment and TVL changes before drawing any conclusions. From the code, ecosystem complementarity does not equal stability; retention rate also needs to be considered. After researching late at night, it is worth noting the incentive mechanism design for cross-application traffic diversion—this is the key factor.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterKing

· 9h ago

I'm familiar with this approach. Walking on multiple legs is indeed more stable than jumping on a single leg. I've seen projects before that support the entire chain but end up disappearing with a snap. I think Sei's multi-dimensional layout this time is promising, but it all depends on whether Kindred AI can truly connect everything; otherwise, it will just be a display.

View OriginalReply0

NFTFreezer

· 9h ago

Multithreaded deployment is indeed reliable, much better than betting on a single project. However, how long this ecological complementarity can last remains to be seen. The position of Kindred AI is indeed interesting, feeling like a glue role in the ecosystem. Sei's move was well played, dispersing risk while also creating positive feedback. It all depends on whether it can truly be implemented later. Single-point hits are ultimately unstable; multi-dimensional layout is the right way. I agree with this logic. Hmm... It's great to see all major tracks advancing simultaneously, but the key is whether they can truly drive each other forward rather than operating independently.

View OriginalReply0

ContractSurrender

· 9h ago

This is the right attitude for playing the ecosystem; instead of taking reckless risks, it's better to proceed steadily and surely.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 9h ago

Expanding across multiple chains is indeed stable, but how many can actually run smoothly? Sei's approach looks promising; let's see if it can hold up in the future.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroJunkie

· 10h ago

Multiple tracks working together is indeed more stable than relying on a single super app. However, I have to raise a question mark about Kindred AI. Connecting multiple scenarios sounds good, but what about the actual conversion rate?

View OriginalReply0